[x]

The implication in the above statement is that TAX INCREASES are required.

That's not what I said.

My point was you can't cut taxes, not worry about spending, ignore deficits, and think that everything will be alright because you're talking about "growth" all the time.

If you're going to see "real reductions in Government spending," that's another story. But what makes you think you're actually going to see that any time soon?

We cannot count on growth alone ...

No argument there.

[Deagle]

Growth is mostly confidence in Government by all folks, then lower taxes on the producers, then lower regulations on the producers, then good luck. Seems that the Democrats depend mostly on the good luck option.

[usconservative]

That's not what I said.

Didn't say you said it. All I said was that's an implication of the statement.

Not trying to cause an argument here, we're supposed to be on the same side aren't we?

[usconservative]

If you're going to see "real reductions in Government spending," that's another story. But what makes you think you're actually going to see that any time soon?

Couldn't let that go by without a response. I think I was clear that given the current ass-clowns in power, we wouldn't see that anytime soon.

[Liberty Wins]

Didn’t any of you people live through the Reagan years?

You GROW your way out of debt. Works every time.