Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
This war started to go sour before the first U.S. soldier set foot in Iraq.

Iraq once had a leader who was very effective at quelling sectarian violence. His name was Saddam Hussein.

It was the U.S. that toppled his government, remember?

I'm sorry, but my Give A Sh!t doesn't work anymore.

23 posted on 11/03/2013 3:13:34 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Well, our troops did a great job getting in, despite the last minute refusal of Turkey to let the northern wing of the attack come through their country.

And there doesn’t seem to be much question that Saddam was getting too big for his britches, and bent on conquering the whole Middle East, one way or another.

And Saddam did meet with the chief of the 9/11 terrorists, although the press went out of their way to deny it.

But it seemed obvious to me at the time that Saudi Arabia was the chief force behind the terrorists. I thought Bush was doing in to secure the Iraqi oil before he took on the Saudis.

But, no. As you say, he didn’t really seem interested in doing what needed to be done.

So, what was the point?

At the time


34 posted on 11/03/2013 5:46:16 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson