Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert

I still blame Ross Perot for Clinton. Clinton won with 42% of the vote. Bush wasn’t perfect, but Clinton started the US on a decline that I don’t think it will ever recover from. (Of course, Bush didn’t help himself either)

Just think, if Clinton had lost, he would have been discarded like Mondale and Dukakis. He and Hillary would be trivia questions now.


15 posted on 11/03/2013 8:37:01 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Cowboy Bob

One could say Nader but GW Bush over the top with <48% against Gore. Gore would present plenty of problems on his own. But W started us down the road of Iraq - Afghanistan - ?? Thousands of lives including 4500 US military. Trillions of dollars. It’s been going on both ways. Should we limit elections to 2 parties only?


33 posted on 11/03/2013 9:23:05 AM PST by Reynoldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cowboy Bob

Clinton and the Bushes are on the same side working for the NWO and anti-sovereignty. Clinton wasn’t going to lose because he was anointed long ago just like Barry Soetoro. His lousy character is what makes him so attractive to the Satan team.


37 posted on 11/03/2013 9:40:36 AM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cowboy Bob

Clinton didn’t start the decline. The decline started long ago. LBJ cemented the republic’s failure with Great Society socialism.


65 posted on 11/03/2013 5:39:45 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson