Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: njslim

If they’re talking about retiring this..., the the story gains credence. If they’re talking about it coming on line, it’s more or less laughable.

Lockheed doesn’t leak. We don’t know that the hell they have until they retire it. Mach 6 sounds about right, again, if you’re talking about the SR-71 replacement.

It’s replacement should be in the range of Mach 10-12.


11 posted on 11/01/2013 4:33:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (People will retain the power to control the Government, or it will retain the power to control them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

I’m afraid you’re living fifty years in the past.

The leakproof lockheed doesn’t exist anymore, neither does the loyal president or even the loyal military.


18 posted on 11/01/2013 4:48:03 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

Anything that needs an air breathing propulsion system cannot be called a “space vehicle” of any magnitude. If it’s breathing air, it’s still in the atmosphere!!!


20 posted on 11/01/2013 4:53:09 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I pledge to the USSA & 2 the democrazy for witch it stands, a nation with liberalism & misery 4 all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

Considering that it has been 50+ years since their inception it might be possible that it could go into LEO.


22 posted on 11/01/2013 4:57:07 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson