Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interior Secretary: Obama Will Use Executive Powers to Conserve Lands
Reuters via Rig Zone ^ | November 01, 2013 | Patrick Rucker

Posted on 11/01/2013 10:08:17 AM PDT by thackney

President Barack Obama will use his executive powers to protect more mountains, rivers and forests from development if Congress does not act to preserve such wild spaces, the U.S. Interior Secretary said on Thursday.

Portions of the Grand Canyon, Redwood forests in California and Caribbean seascapes have been protected under the 1906 Antiquities Act, which gives the president broad authority to put natural terrain and historic sites under federal protection.

Such preservation efforts can also come through Congress but presidents in a second term have typically felt freer to designate such spaces unilaterally.

On Thursday, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said that the president was ready to move ahead.

"There's no question that if Congress doesn't act, we will act," Jewell said at a luncheon at the National Press Club in Washington.

Lawmakers have proposed roughly two dozen sites for federal protection, but partisan divisions have helped stall many of those plans.

Jewell, the former chief executive of outdoor gear and clothing retailer REI, said proposals that have backing in Congress - including planned designation of coastal regions of California and Maine as well as a swath of the Arizona desert - are among the first that could be considered.

"I'll be understanding why these places are special before we go ahead with any action," Jewell said of her plans to visit parts of the country in the coming weeks where there is a public groundswell for putting land under federal stewardship.

(Excerpt) Read more at rigzone.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: agenda21; energy; executiveorders; naturalgas; oil; un21
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Excerpted for Reuters content
1 posted on 11/01/2013 10:08:17 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Conserve them for what the Chineese ?


2 posted on 11/01/2013 10:09:08 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom ;Sarcasm is my bidness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If Congress doesn’t act.....now where have I heard this before? And we all know what happens when the government takes over land and memorials, don’t we?


3 posted on 11/01/2013 10:10:11 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Yup. No drillin’ in eastern Nevada where there’s a whole bunch of petroleum. Energy prices gotta necessarily skyrocket and finding more product won’t help that happen.


4 posted on 11/01/2013 10:10:51 AM PDT by rktman (Let sleeping wives lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

You didn’t think those democrats were actually human, did you?

Aliens Are After Our Oil
http://blog.trutv.com/conspiracy/2013/01/10/aliens-are-after-our-oil/index.html


5 posted on 11/01/2013 10:12:23 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
How much is left of Nevada that the gubmint DOESN'T own, 5%?

This is Agenda 21 bullsh!t.

6 posted on 11/01/2013 10:12:26 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The single party Dems here in this part of Maryland never heard of land conservation here, more housing developments = more Democrat sheep voters and higher taxes.

The building is endless.

its why the deer are such a problem.
Schools and roads crowded.


7 posted on 11/01/2013 10:12:30 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Federal land confiscation. Plain and simple.


8 posted on 11/01/2013 10:13:19 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

They’ve always held over 85% of the land in the state. Something to do with what “they” “owned” when it was still a territory. Most of the west fell under that scam and had to agree to it to become states. Must be plenty of depots and garrisons out there cloaked in invisibility. And, yes agenda 21 is BS. The gang-green bunch try to coat it with sugar but it still stinks. Zoning restrictions, green belts, community “standards”, etc., etc.


9 posted on 11/01/2013 10:18:17 AM PDT by rktman (Let sleeping wives lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Hussein golfs, but the RATS never sleep.


10 posted on 11/01/2013 10:18:26 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Federal land confiscation. Plain and simple.

Don't the Feds own this acreage anyway? It's all BLM rangeland as things stand now. How can they confiscate acreage from themselves?
11 posted on 11/01/2013 10:24:43 AM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Florida is ate up with this Agenda 21 BS.

They call them green corridors and are owned by conservation trusts. I am surrounded by them!


12 posted on 11/01/2013 10:25:07 AM PDT by seeker41 (take your country back by whatever means necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle

Blue Turtle: “If Congress doesn’t act...”

I haven’t read the laws governing this, but I don’t doubt Congress gave the president the ability to put “natural terrain and historic sites” under federal protection. They probably never imagined a president who would use his executive authority so expansively, but that’s irrelevant. President Obama can get away with it—legally—because Congress abdicated their power.

A classic example is the 16th Amendment. When some said they should put a percentage limit, like 10%, on the amount of income tax that could be charged, others said it was unnecessary, because government would never charge that much. I don’t know if the progressives/liberals/statists intentionally left the income tax unlimited in order to subsequently abuse it, but the idiots who reasonably wanted to limit it should have never cooperated otherwise.

It’s also pretty foolish to rely on the Supreme Court to reign in bad law, btw. We have all witnessed how well that works for us, a la the (un)Affordable Care Act.


13 posted on 11/01/2013 10:27:29 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Conservatives are not anarchists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Trying to change the subject away from Benghazi, IRS scandals, Fast & Furious gun running ...

Plus continuing the Marxist agenda of destroying freedom, the rule of law, and ...


14 posted on 11/01/2013 10:38:03 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Here is the problem that LIVs don’t get. All property in the continental US is “owned”. Property that is not owned by a private citizen or company is owned by the state.

It needs to be purchased by the Fed, not “designated” and restricted.


15 posted on 11/01/2013 10:44:13 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Waiting for next tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Coastal regions of Maine? There’s already one national park there and at least 15 State parks plus a lot of other protected areas. Drive along route 1, and it looks like a lot of nice little towns with a lot of woods. There’s not a lot of unihabited space that isn’t already protected. Is Obama going to start shutting all those beach houses and closing down those fishing towns? That would be madness.


16 posted on 11/01/2013 10:46:56 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

But no drilling or fracking in the western part of MD.


17 posted on 11/01/2013 11:03:14 AM PDT by cork (Remember Bengazi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If you like your property, you can keep your property, period.


18 posted on 11/01/2013 11:06:40 AM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why bother having a Congress.


19 posted on 11/01/2013 11:23:01 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Most of those states west of the Mississippi started as Federal Territory before it became a state. Significant amounts of acreage were never released to the new state but held by the Feds from before it even was a state.


20 posted on 11/01/2013 11:26:32 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson