Ron Paul to Campaign for Cuccinelli on Monday (bring the Libertarians home!)

washingtontimes.com ^ | 10/30/13 | David Sherfinski

[cotton1706]

Former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, a tea party and libertarian hero, will campaign for Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II on Monday — a day before voters go to the polls to choose Virginia’s next governor.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, will also make appearances on behalf of Mr. Cuccinelli in the days leading up to Election Day.

Mr. Walker is scheduled to campaign with Mr. Cuccinelli in Prince William and Spotsylvania counties Saturday, and Mr. Rubio is scheduled to appear in Warrenton and Culpeper Monday. News of the appearances was first reported by Politico.

Democrat Terry McAuliffe has held a modest but steady lead over Mr. Cuccinelli in recent polling, with surveys suggesting that Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis, who is polling at around 10 percent, could be siphoning away enough votes to make a difference in the outcome.

President Obama is scheduled to headline a rally for Mr. McAuliffe Sunday in Arlington, and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. will be in Annandale on Monday.

[cotton1706]

If the current polls are accurate, despite the intentional and continual pummeling of Cuccinelli by the Washington beltway newspapers, Cuccinelli is only four points down. If the libertarians vote republican, Cuccinelli can win this!

[Liz]

The race seemed to tighten when Rand Paul came to VA and told libertarians to vote for Cuccinelli....and not for the libertarian spoiler, Sarvis. Ron is coming in to campaign for Ken---he should tell Sarvis to throw his support to Ken. Sarvis has no chance of winning. Sarvis is only enabling Clinton/McAuliffe to run rampant over Va....now....and in 2016.

=====================================================

Wheeler-dealer McAuliffe is ogling the VA treasury ....and the conniving Clintons are having wet dreams about Terry fixing the Va vote for Hilly come 2016. VA voters who vote for McAuliffe are making a deal with three devils.

=================================================

(Snicker) the "dearly departed" are also McAuliffe voters.

TERRY, THESE GHOULISH THING REMIND ME OF YOU McAuliffe is apparently polling well---and prolly receiving mucho campaign cash---from the "dearly departed" b/c a lawsuit Democrats filed says “the [VA State Board of Elections] is rushing to complete the purging of dead voters in time to have the desired effect on the upcoming gubernatorial election.....to make sure that those who no longer live here don’t vote here."

(cackle) The "dearly departed" are also Hillary voters. Terry is 2016 Hillary's place-keeper. If elected, grave-robber Terry will fix the vote---dead or alive---for Hilly. (That's after he rapes the VA state treasury.)

=======================================================

DEAD AND READY Another shady example of how the connected ex-DNC chair, Obama suck-up, and Clinton confidant, mixes business with politics to profit himself....with the dead and near-dead as his victims.

<><>McAuliffe apparently lied to VA voters---according to McAuliffe's campaign, he invested $33,000 in the notorious Caramadre death fund and received $80,000 in return, a $47,000 profit. However, documents submitted in Caramadre's trial by federal authorities indicated that McAuliffe's profit was actually $114,000, or $34,000 more than McAuliffe admitted to voters.

<><> According to official RI court records, McAuliffe’s connection to Caramadre came to light via court records linking McAuliffe’s investment directly with the terminally ill, ailing mechanic; official forms identified them as "acquaintances" (apparently a requirement to allow McAuliffe to cash in).

<><> When the irrefutable court records surfaced, McAuliffe’s campaign then said McA did not know the mechanic and doesn’t know why they were listed as "acquaintances."

<><> NOTE: if official files were falsified to profit McAuliffe, that's a felony in any state.

[Liz]

Cuccinelli needs to keep hammering McAuliffe on the Obamacare debacle....w/ last-minute TV ads.....McA’s pals the Clintons tried to implement a similar mess 20 years ago....but were shot down b/c of the secrecy Hillary employed.

McAwfull has ten times the funds that Cuccinelli has——so start the avalanche of contributions to Ken....

CUCCINELLI DONATION WEB SITE—click here

https://secure.piryx.com/donate/FkzOS94c/Ken-Cuccinelli-for-Governor/nav-bar

[Servant of the Cross]

Hooray for Ron Paul! [probably the first time I've ever said that]

Robert Sarvis is a complete loser. Worst candidate ever. Wouldn't surprise me if he was paid to run by McAwful. No self respecting libertarian should ever vote for him.

"uh ... um ... legalize marijuana ... whatever dude ... "[paid for by McAwful for Guv campaign, BJC treasurer]

GO KEN CUCCINELLI!

[C. Edmund Wright]

This is a huge development, and I commend Ron Paul...not my fave by any means, for this. Cooch is a pretty darned good candidate and Sarvis is a pure loser. However, this will be the test:
Is Sarvis support really among small government types? Or is it simply dopers and haters of Christianity? If they are really limited gov types, Paul will bring them home. If they are the other, it won’t mean much.

I’m super glad to see it....but this will be very teachable....

[X-spurt]

Sure is asking a lot of libertarians fixated on “their way or the highway”.

[corkoman]

Sure is asking a lot of libertarians fixated on “their way or the highway”.

As much as asking a totalitarian GOPer to abide by principles.

[HokieMom]

BTTT!

[X-spurt]

Don’t know if I’ve ever seen any “totalitarian GOPer” on FR at least for very long.

Guessin my stone tossed over the fence found the dog that barked.....

[CatherineofAragon]

I can’t stand the sight of that chinless little queer marriage pusher. I’d love to know exactly who is financing all the commercials he’s airing.

Sarvis for small government? Pffft. He’s for taxing carbon emissions; how does that fit into a small government platform?

[Seattle Conservative]

An article from today on Sarvis:

October 31, 2013 4:00 AM
Sarvis a Libertarian? Nope
The Virginia gubernatorial candidate is a social liberal.

By Charles C. W. Cooke

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/362690/sarvis-libertarian-nope-charles-c-w-cooke

[ansel12]

The Virginia gubernatorial candidate is a social liberal.

Social liberalism is what defines libertarians, drugs, abortion, gay liberty.

Libertarianism versus conservatism is a war against social conservatism.

Sarvis is true to the libertarian agenda on social issues.

[Gopher Broke]

You can download a copy of the Family Foundation Voter guide at this location: http://vavotes.net/guide/

The Faith and Freedom Coalition version can be viewed here: http://virginiavoterguide.com/

[Seattle Conservative]

Agree

[ansel12]

I’ve been reading most every thread on this and have not yet noticed a libertarian taking him to task for any libertarian shortcomings on abortion and the gay agenda, drugs etc.