Skip to comments.
AAPS Sues to Stop the Unlawful Revisions to ObamaCare (no delay of employer mandate)
heraldonline.com ^
| 10/30/2013
| Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
Posted on 10/30/2013 8:29:33 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: RoosterRedux
Oh my. Barry’s day just got worse.
21
posted on
10/30/2013 8:57:32 AM PDT
by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: Carry_Okie
Congress definitely would have standing.
22
posted on
10/30/2013 9:00:09 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: KarlInOhio
The problem is ... I think this boils down to what the framers talked about, virtue. Devoid of virtue, a republic is impossible. These are the times we live in, we've voted in a despot. Either it is a temporary thing, that will be corrected at the ballot box, or.... if will only be corrected using some other type of "box".
23
posted on
10/30/2013 9:01:58 AM PDT
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: RoosterRedux
I wholeheartedly agree...seriously. Stick with the schedule and implement it now. People voted for it, make them take it. Now.
24
posted on
10/30/2013 9:03:13 AM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: All
The delay in the employer mandate means that many Americans who might have had the protection of employer-purchased insurance will either have to purchase costly individual insurance for themselves, or else pay a tax. Actually, as I understand it, the delay would give employers some breathing room before deciding what to do...and stopping the delay will mean this storm named Obamacare will crash on the shores of corporate America at the same time it is hitting individuals.
Corporations will have to cut their employees' hours immediately (or by the end of the year) or consider them full time workers eligible for insurance (or subsidy).
25
posted on
10/30/2013 9:06:25 AM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing -- Socrates)
To: mojito
Oh my. Barrys day just got worse.Oh no it didn't. This guy is definitely the Teflon president. And some of the people he has around him a completely Despotic. This will not end well.
26
posted on
10/30/2013 9:06:52 AM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: RoosterRedux
Is the fact that Obama lied about Americans being able to keep their health plan and other nefarious deeds he pulled off to get this crappy p.o.s. (Obama Care) on the backs of the American people........ is this NOT an Impeachable offense?
To: Old Retired Army Guy
You would think Republicans would be smart enough to... Did you seriously just type that?
28
posted on
10/30/2013 9:30:07 AM PDT
by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: RoosterRedux
Even on the fast track it would take no less than 18 months to come before SCOTUS.
Obama knew this before he did it.
To: Old Retired Army Guy
You must have standing in the court to file a suit. You have to be able to show how this law hurts *you* personally. You can’t just sue because it’s wrong.
Finding an appropriate group who’s willing fight the suit, a solid legal team that’s willing to take the case, and the money to bring a case to the level of the SC isn’t easy.
30
posted on
10/30/2013 9:35:16 AM PDT
by
Marie
(When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
To: RoosterRedux; P-Marlowe
What is their basis for standing? My first thought is that it will be tossed for standing....they haven’t yet been injured by the changed employer mandate.
31
posted on
10/30/2013 9:37:36 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: RoosterRedux
32
posted on
10/30/2013 9:40:28 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
( We've grown to trust MSM hatred. When the MSM hates one of us it's an endorsement.)
To: RoosterRedux
They’re right: only Congress can pass a law.
Of course, the government (including the court) has decided that they shouldn’t be limited by the US Constitution anymore - so I wish them luck.
33
posted on
10/30/2013 9:49:14 AM PDT
by
Tzimisce
To: RoosterRedux; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; ...
Physicians file lawsuit in Wisconsin to stop constant changes to ACA.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
To: KarlInOhio
...digging through all this will require someone who has read every word of Obamacare and all the relevant sections of the US code. Calling Betsy McCaughey!
To: Old Retired Army Guy
You would think Republicans would be smart enough to to file a constitution violation suit a long time ago in the knowledge that if Obama wanted to delay the Employer Mandate it meant that the Mandate would adversely effect the economy and the Democrat hopes in the 2014 elections. I am beginning to believe that the Republican party should get an A for Dumb.
Fighting the delay of the Employer Mandate would tick off too many of the GOP-e's K street buddies.
Notice how they didn't lift a finger to help out the penny public. Because the GOP-e answers to K street, not us.
36
posted on
10/30/2013 9:55:47 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: xzins
When are the rest of the doctors going to get organized against Obamacare? Don’t they realize their freedom to practice is being sucked away (just like one of those monstrous abortion machines)?
37
posted on
10/30/2013 9:57:18 AM PDT
by
Liberty Wins
( The average lefty is synapse challenged)
To: Liberty Wins
I agree with them that it is unconstitutional for the executive to change a law.
That, however, does not prove that those doctors have been injured by a mandate that hasn’t yet taken effect. So, my concern is that their suit will get tossed on account of standing.
I think doctors should claim they are being injured by the law penalizing the doctor if a patient smokes.
38
posted on
10/30/2013 10:01:46 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: All
39
posted on
10/30/2013 10:06:58 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: afraidfortherepublic; All
*APPLAUSE*
And those people have mean lawyers and deep, deep pockets to boot! :)
40
posted on
10/30/2013 10:32:22 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson