Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

i have no doubt that we knew Saddam was behind the anthrax attacks and that we covered it up so that we wouldn’t have to go all nuclear on him.

Didn’t Obama recently amend the policy that we had to use similar or more deadly force if we are attacked by chemical, biological or nuclear weapons? things that make you go hmmmmmm


9 posted on 10/29/2013 8:19:14 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: FreeAtlanta; butterdezillion
http://www.bing.com/search?q=obama+changes+US+policy+on+retaliation&go=&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=obama+changes+us+policy+on+retaliation&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=790b62073ced481da0d6fe7e67c0348d

yep, he did. I really think this is because he now knows that Saddam used Anthrax against us and that if it came out Bush would have had to go against long standing US policy. Thus, he didn't want to get himself in the same jam on a likely coming(or already happened) chemical, radiological or biological attack.

10 posted on 10/29/2013 8:39:19 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson