To: JRandomFreeper
Well J; you’re better than that.
Cruz is not clearly eligible but, he is by oblique reason.
Still, he is stunning as an intellect and embodiment of of American ideals of the past and the necessities of of our future.
I will support him.
53 posted on
10/28/2013 8:01:23 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Vendome
It's clear to me. And the owner of this site has made himself clear on the issue. I'm not interested in being a rude guest by arguing about a subject the owner considers closed.
/johnny
To: Vendome; JRandomFreeper
Cruz is not clearly eligible but, he is by oblique reason.
I would argue the opposite: Until the Constitution, which is doesn't, and/or settled law states otherwise, which it doesn't, Ted Cruz is eligible to be President of the U.S.
It is very clear, there is no murkiness on the issue except, mostly, by those who desire to get Zero on this issue.
There evidence is flimsy at best, and is not based on or rooted in the Constitution or settled U.S. Law.
71 posted on
10/28/2013 8:45:13 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Vendome
“Cruz is not clearly eligible “
To Hell he is not. You have nothing to back up that liberal assertion. You don’t have the right to claim another American is not an American.
93 posted on
10/28/2013 9:55:53 AM PDT by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson