Your point is well made, but yet, think back to the 1960s with its hundreds of race riots in cities.
The comparison between our urban black citizens and Muslims seems very appropriate. A popular reference seen on FR is Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat, published in 2005. He wrote that Islam will overwhelm Christendom unless Christians recognize the demographic realities, begin reproducing again, and share the gospel with Muslims.
They do a show of force through large gatherings when outnumbered by the host population and center themselves in urban areas.
When outnumbered, they will appear as the victim. When they obtain the majority, they become the aggressor.
Once they gain the majority, they strike down the host population or drive them out by use of the “minority” radicals and seize what were the host population properties.
Once Muslims move into an area, they spread into the social fabric through the establishment of mosques and stores in every part of the city to bring Muslims into areas once dominated by only the host population. Then they use the political sphere to get Muslims elected into local, then state, then federal offices by sheer numbers in order to take over the entire social, economic, and political host through the protection of what is defined as a religion.
Dr. Hammond then went on to list a graduated scale of Muslim sub-populations in nations and their behavior as their percentage increased.
1. As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.
2. At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
3. From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
4. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.
The U.S. black population according to the 2010 census was 12.6%.
5. After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.
Dr. Hammond continues the scale comparisons, but my point is that a nationwide civil/race war would not necessarily be the accurate scenario in the U.S. with blacks vs. whites. The warfare seemingly would start in the large urban centers with high percentages of black population - again think back to the 1960s. Of course, should the fighting start, then all bets are off. Other agendas from the shadows may well come into effect at that point. I haven't read any of Bracken's books, but I get the sense from some postings here on FR that is the direction he foresees matters heading.
Good points.
Whites learned from the riots of the 1960s, and we’ve evolved to a point here in NJ where many whites live in one suburb and commute to another (completely bypassing the urban welfare reservations - which are increasingly Hispanic). As far as living anywhere near black opulations, working whites know better - it doesn’t work. When Newark NJ lays off 160 police officers at the height of a murder wave, then you know they are done; no private money was donated to keep them on the job, and there was nothing left to squeeze from taxpayers (individual or corporate). The only investment left is by the government and quasi-government agencies (mainly entertainment venues).
We have Muslims, but they mainly prefer to live with their own communities. Christians (or former Christians) will never match their birthrate (their four wives make that impractical), but the same liberal streak that put closeted Muslim in the White House will prevent them from ever making inroads in the US politically or socially. In Holland Muslims had the distinction of uniting the Dutch far right and far left with their evil.