[Daveinyork]

Are we allowed to express some schadenfreude?

[FourtySeven]

No, that would be hateful.

Only Democrats are allowed to experience moments of joy in others’ misery.

Then it’s called “intolerance for intolerance”. In other words tolerance.

Don’t be a stupid hick; learn to bow to your new leftist overlords.

[Enterprise]

"Are we allowed to express some schadenfreude?"

With 5,000 watt megaphones from the tallest buildings.

[Servant of the Cross]

Are we allowed to express some schadenfreude?

ABSOLUTELY. VDH ping too.

[dblshot]

Schadenfreude may be a lower Psycohologial level form of sadistic personality disorder as described in DSM-III-R and as such a mental health issue covered under Obamacare. So yes you are allowed to express schadenfreude and in fact may be able to get subsidized care for it.

DSM-III-R criteria for sadistic personality disorder. The third revised edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) included a now-defunct diagnosis for sadistic personality disorder, which describes an enduring and maladaptive pattern of dominating and abusing others with cruel, humiliating, or aggressive behavior (Millon, Grossman, Millon, Meagher, & Ramnath, 2004). Although it was removed in subsequent editions—partially due to political concerns over a male diagnostic bias and its potential to be used as a defense in domestic violence cases—many clinical practitioners still believe in the validity of such a diagnosis (Meloy, 1997). As one psychiatrist put it, “Sadistic personality disorder: not in the DSM, but still in the USA” (Meloy, 1997, p. 631).

[big'ol_freeper]

Probably not. The republicrats will find some way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.