Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I know it’s not going to be ‘popular’, but the “more conservative version) house bill has not gone far enough.

ABSOLUTELY NO ONE should enjoy waivers, exempt or any such thing. Obama, Pelosi unions and progressives want to enact this ‘law of the land’ onto the nation, they should be made shining examples of said law.

Don’t do the short term deal to ‘open up’ the government - once gop retreat on this, they are DONE!


2 posted on 10/15/2013 7:47:00 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Napsalot

Waivers, IMHO, are unconstitutional.


5 posted on 10/15/2013 7:53:16 AM PDT by biff (WAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

Maybe they want to run against union waver and indiv mandate penalty. Strategery?


6 posted on 10/15/2013 7:57:38 AM PDT by epluribus_2 (he had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

When the republicans put in their bill that the congress and their staffs should not get subsidies, they’re admitting obama has the power to grant the subsidies. It’s alreadly in the law. It shouldn’t be in a new one.


29 posted on 10/15/2013 11:40:59 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson