Posted on 10/14/2013 6:29:14 AM PDT by IbJensen
DJ Frisat: “How about names, dates, methods & techniques, things only known to the killer & police, etc.?”
The guy sounds like a loon to me. Absent specifics that’s what I think about his so-called revelations, too.
Yours is an interesting perspective. Yes. This would have a tendency to inoculate the Clintons from other revelations. I don’t buy into the Obama isn’t a citizen line of thought, for example, but everyone who questions anything about Obama’s past is dismissed as just another birther. Yet, there are aspects of Obama’s past, like his college records, that are suspicious. Why would he cover them up if he had something to hide? That alone makes them worthy of closer scrutiny.
Larry’s been saying this for 20 years but he can’t get anybody to listen —
Indeed, several come to mind. Thanks for the ping!
FINALLY ! The mystery of the untimely murder of Vince Foster might be resolved.
Whatever will this terrible admission do to the National Poll standing of Mrs. Bill Clinton being “The most popular Woman in America?”
Oh dear, what WILL she do?
BTW, just what IS an “untimely” murder?
An untimely murder is rather like a turd that rises to the surface to spoil someone’s punch at a garden party.
Good analogy!
BTW, is Mrs. Bill Clinton’s favorite candy bar the one call “Babe Ruth?”
I remember in the Clinton era seeing multiple posts here listing the names and dates and positions of people who were unlucky enough to die during the Clinton administration.
They coined the term Arkanside for these killings, including one shot in the back of the head that was considered a suicide. They were people who maybe (or maybe not) had the goods on the Clintons.
When the bad guys are the law enforcement folks, to whom does one turn for relief?
And when he's found decapitated, the cause of death will be "natural causes".
Sure -- I remember that, too. I don't think you're understanding what I meant.
If he's serious about this, I'm looking for Nichols to come out and say 'I killed so-and-so on such-and-such a date, using this weapon', along with locations, time of day and details about the crimes that are only known to the killer and law-enforcement.
He's been ignored for how many years now, and he's going to continue to be portrayed as a nutbar if he can't produce indisputable evidence. Otherwise, he'll just be characterized as an attention-seeking lunatic.
If he did, you wonder if anyone would care, anymore. I suppose it would depend on how close the Clinton people are to the Obama Justice Department.
I never assume what used to be shameful or illegal is still shameful or illegal.
I do agree with you.
LOL -- another 'At this point, what difference does it make?' moment. Serves Hillary well, doesn't it?
One of the most telling things is that the tapes of the 24hr videos on the evening that Foster visited the white house somehow disappeared.
So that no one would know that he did NOT leave the white house normally under surveillance.
The story I believe is that he was taken out rolled in a rug (rug strands found on the body) and taken out through the basement, apparently through a tunnel.
IIRC that blonde bimbo that worked for the Clintons and later became a news person was in the mix downstairs somehow. I think she was boffing someone there at the time.
Probably glanced up and saw it as SOP for the Clintons and paid it no mind as she was busy.
DC Clothesline is not a very reputable source. Lots of stories on their site are sensationalized and have only a smitten of truth. I think they are trying to build up their readership and get more “hits” but I have stopped looking at what they post because very little is truthful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.