Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

There is a big difference between a bear and a wolf. bears are usually not carnivorous.


16 posted on 10/13/2013 8:51:23 AM PDT by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer

“bears are usually not carnivorous.”

Ever been near bears when they are hungry? How about mountain lions that can snag a child faster than any wolf and with much more stealth? We don’t put kids in cages for either of them. We’ve also got Bobcats and Lynx. Wolves have also been reintroduced into Colorado. We still don’t use cages.


20 posted on 10/13/2013 9:17:53 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer; CodeToad

I have to agree with Code-bears are omnivorous-they are opportunists. I would not want to count on a bear not being carnivorous-or even hungry for that matter-people get killed that way. I don’t live in bear country now, but I do carry pepper spray and a big stick when I hike in the woods for anything else.

There is a balance in the natural world that God put there, but some people keep screwing with it and bitching when they get hurt


21 posted on 10/13/2013 9:19:56 AM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer

bears are usually not carnivorous....OH, YEAH? Tell my bird feeder about that...Oh..wait..never mind.


47 posted on 10/13/2013 3:14:42 PM PDT by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson