Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moonshinner_09

I’m going to work at a detention center Monday. We are supposed to be targeted for protests. No deportations will take place Monday because of it.


14 posted on 10/12/2013 1:08:57 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganÃœberAlles

How nice. You have to be surreptitious about enforcing the law.

Wonder if Judge Broomfield will issue a restraining order against the Mexican terrorist organizations trying to intimidate you. Or perhaps appoint a “monitor” to make sure you don’t do anything mean to them, like arrest them for violent obstruction of justice.


16 posted on 10/12/2013 1:36:09 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

Actually I’ve thought about it and the ante should be raised.

Charge them with Terrorism.

I was born and raised in Tucson, my grandfather was the police chief. Were he to be there now he would not have hesitated to use armed force against ANYONE doing this, and ruthlessly so.

The guy had stared down the Nazi Party leadership in Czechoslovakia, a few Mexican agitators he would not have thought twice about.

And that’s the point: U.S. law enforcement has been neutered. Before 1970, the Mexicans were terrified of U.S. law enforcement and rightfully so. The Border Patrol in the 50’s and 60’s made Zero apologies.

The Tucson Police routinely stopped and arrested anyone who looked the part; spoke Spanish with no English, it didn’t matter. You’d see them pulled over on Speedway with a TPD car behind them and a green BP van behind that.

The driver was arrested and handed over directly to the BP if he couldn’t provide a passport with a visa. They didn’t waste time, off they went to Nogales and that was it: walked them to the Mexican side and adios, don’t come back.

Once the Mexican terrorist organizations got a foothold in the late 60’s - La Raza Unida, LULAC, MEChA - they used violence, intimidation, the courts and the Democratic Party to stop enforcement of the laws.

So it isn’t “civil disobedience”. It’s terrorism.


18 posted on 10/12/2013 5:05:10 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson