Anything that violates the Second Amendment is to much.
What about “shall not be infringed” do these people not understand?
Drugs? Flashbacks?
It’s only a matter of time. CA will lose most of its 2A rights. Maybe just a few more election cycles.
I’d give California back to Mexico but then all those dirty liberals would spread out into the rest of the country.
Doesn’t the PRC have veto-proof majorities in both chambers?
Remember that when they run as pro-gun and they state they would never go after hunters, but only want to restrict those 'mean' assault weapons.
Absolutely astounded that this nut job vetoed anything at all.
SB 374 would have moved me out of the state.
Are there enough gun grabbers in both houses of the legislature to overturn the veto(s)?!
Cali tried to ban handguns back in 1982 with Prop 15. It failed 2 to 1.
Since that time, the state had never allowed the voting public to vote on an anti-gun ordinance. Just can’t trust the WILL OF THE PEOPLE!
'Nope, I wasn't hunting. I was shooting at 'him' and that dam Deer ran in front of my rifle.'Problem solved
(b) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, commencing July 1, 2014, any person in this state who possesses any large-capacity magazine, regardless of the date the magazine was acquired, is guilty of an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100), or is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100), by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.
Thousands of pistols, both in private hands and used by law enforcement, have high capacity magazines.
What happened to SB63 that would ban internet ammo sales?
The lead ammo ban was the worst.