Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

When tazers first hit the street cops told us they would only be used in leiu of bullets. This assurance was made because tazers do have the ability to kill, even if the probability is low. Now tazers are used to gain physical compliance, in the way batons were once used. Unless the police had a situation where bullets were appropriate the tazer never should have left the officer’s belt.


7 posted on 10/07/2013 10:07:19 AM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnTheBorder

“Unless the police had a situation where bullets were appropriate the tazer never should have left the officer’s belt.”

I fully agree. The TAZOR is a lesser form of “deadly force” and should only be used in the stead of bullet.

Except when an officer’s life is in immediate and obvious danger, a TAZOR should not be used.....and never a merely a means to make someone comply. I do not want to be dogmatic though...I am certain there are other legitimate uses for a TAZOR.


10 posted on 10/07/2013 10:14:30 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson