Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin
Including the natural gas that was entering the US thru pipelines or could enter the US thru pipelines plus the LNG that was entering the US thru pre-existing LNG terminals or could enter the US thru the pre-existing LNG terminals, the US never had to supplement her supply with new terminals.

It is easy to say that today. In 2000 almost no one would have agreed. That is why the majors were willing to spend billions for the new LNG import facilities. George Mitchel probably would have agreed with you at the time.

Would you happen to know what the percentage of total NG use in the US was being fulfilled by the import pipelines and the preexisting LNG terminals?

You can do the math by comparing the above data (charts link to data) combined with the breakdown per LNG location at:

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/xls/NG_MOVE_POE1_A_EPG0_IML_MMCF_A.xls

Then compare to total usage at:


49 posted on 10/07/2013 11:45:32 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


Then compare to total usage at:

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_sum_dcu_nus_a.htm


50 posted on 10/07/2013 11:45:59 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson