Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

At least there's some sane judges in the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.
1 posted on 10/04/2013 9:22:02 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

It’s telling that they targeted Abercrombie & Fitch (though I have no love for them nor their stupid advertising).

It’s also indicative of the petty, vindictive, but at the same time dangerous and tyrannical, nature of this administration. It’s the worst combination imaginable-a bunch of people that petty and vindictive, but with the power to be dangerous in enforcing their pettiness, and the will to overstep the legal boundaries because no one in this country will stop them.


2 posted on 10/04/2013 9:27:02 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
There is no RELIGIOUS requirement to wear that thing.

When I was a child, it was required that we females wear something on the head WHEN WE ATTENDED OUR CATHOLIC CHURCH.

3 posted on 10/04/2013 9:27:30 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I for one am loving it.


4 posted on 10/04/2013 9:32:06 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

One baby step.

We shall see what happens next for other cases pending.


5 posted on 10/04/2013 9:32:22 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

8 posted on 10/04/2013 9:36:25 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Maybe she should apply for a job here:


10 posted on 10/04/2013 9:42:50 AM PDT by Gamecock (Many Atheists take the stand: "There is no God AND I hate Him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
The most frightening part of this ruling:

"reckless indifference or in the face of a perceived risk that its actions violated federal law"

So questioning the applicability of a statute or Federal regulations with legal counsel means you're not showing sufficient deference to the almighty State.

That judge doesn't need to be impeached-- she needs to be dragged from the bench and tarred and feathered.

11 posted on 10/04/2013 9:48:55 AM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Why didn’t she wear her do-rag in her employment interview(s)?


15 posted on 10/04/2013 10:07:00 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I have taught members of my family to keep a long distance between them and people in hijab, whether they are in a bank or Walmart.

One never knows when they go Boooooooom!


18 posted on 10/04/2013 10:15:11 AM PDT by 353FMG ( I don't say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Abercrombie & Fitch? Judging from their catalogs, wearing clothes in general does not comport with their policies.


20 posted on 10/04/2013 10:33:30 AM PDT by shego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

She probably showed up to the interview without it, then showed up to work with it.


22 posted on 10/04/2013 11:24:53 AM PDT by MinstrelBoy (If you're a conservative today, you're a hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson