Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Institute Blames America for Muslim Kenya Mall Attack
FrontpageMagazine ^ | September 30, 2013 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 10/01/2013 5:14:47 AM PDT by SJackson

- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -

Ron Paul Institute Blames America for Muslim Kenya Mall Attack

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On September 30, 2013 @ 11:10 am In The Point | 56 Comments

The Ron Paul Institute is not the institution to which Ron Paul has been committed. It’s the Ron Paul outlet. And it reflects his Blame America for Muslim Terror philosophy.

What happened in Kenya is a terrorist act. But for Obama to tell the rest of the story would undermine his narrative and unravel Washington’s strange relationship with the al-Qaeda affilliated al-Shabaab organization that claimed responsibility for the attack. Al-Shabaab, or “Mujahideen Youth Movement,” in fact owes its birth to US interventionism in Africa, as it sprang up from the ashes of the Islamic Courts Movement that had ruled Somalia until a US-sponsored invasion by Ethiopia destroyed the Courts Movement in 2007 and divided supporters into factions. Some decided to work with the US-supported Transitional Federal Government (TFG); others, like the al-Shabaab, decided to resist US and other foreign occupation and intervention in Somali affairs.

As globetrotting analyst Pepe Escobar points out in a highly recommended recent article, the Islamic Courts had generally stabilized Somalia and disarmed many of the militias. They were proponents of Sharia law, which the US found intolerable and labeled “terrorist,” opening the door for the brand new US Africa Command, based in Germany, to begin working on regime change.

The Islamic Courts Union had stabilized Somalia the way that the Taliban had stabilized Afghanistan.  That didn’t stop liberals from repeatedly defending the ICU, despite its nightmarish atrocities.

However the Ron Paul Institute claims that the Islamic Courts Union would have left the rest of Africa alone if we left them alone. This single idiotic idea underpins the Paul isolationism position. It’s also laughably untrue.

The one thing that committed Islamists who believe in regional Caliphates and repeating the conquests of Mohammed don’t do is leave other people alone.

More to the point, the Islamic Courts Union had relied on foreign Jihadists from the very beginning and was part of the Bin Laden network.

Hassan Dahir Aweys, the head of the ICU, originally headed up the Islamic Union, a Muslim terrorist group operating in Somalia in the 1990s and funded by Osama bin Laden.

Osama bin Laden saw the opportunity early on. In the early 1990s, the Saudi exile began sending money and weapons to a Somali group called al-Itihaad al- Islamiya (Unity of Islam), followed by men who trained and fought alongside the Somali militants who aimed to turn the country into a radical Islamic republic.

U.S. intelligence officials, members of the al-Itihaad organization worked with al Qaeda operatives in planning the 1998 East Africa bombing attacks, which killed 224 people.

Al-Itihaad was Aweys’ Islamic Union.

The Ron Paul Institute’s idea that this goes back to 2007 is laughably ignorant. Somalia was part of Bin Laden’s Jihad network.

The Islamic Court Union was intertwined with Al Qaeda fighters and with Al Qaeda’s global money laundering schemes. The United States didn’t destabilize Somalia. It helped prevent Somalia from becoming an even more toxic place than it is today.

Does the Ron Paul Institute really believe that Al Qaeda’s allies wouldn’t have used Somalia as a base for African terrorism regardless of what the United States did?

The leader of the Islamic group that controls much of southern Somalia has revived the idea of a “Greater Somalia” that would incorporate regions of Kenya and Ethiopia – a move that could further stoke tensions with the neighboring countries.

Sheik Hassan Dahir Aweys, chairman of the Council of Islamic Courts, told Shabelle Radio in an interview late Friday that his group would work to unite ethnic Somali peoples, but he did not say how it proposed to achieve a “Greater Somalia.”

This is the first time that Aweys has spoken about expanding the influence of the Islamic courts outside Somalia since his group seized control of the capital, Mogadishu, in June and then consolidated its control over most of southern Somalia.

“We will leave no stone unturned to integrate our Somali brothers in Kenya and Ethiopia and restore their freedom to live with their ancestors in Somalia,” he said.

Somali Islamists were always going to push into Kenya and Ethiopia. That is why Kenya and Ethiopia tried to stabilize Somalia. In self-defense.

The Ron Paul Institute quotes “globe-trotting analyst Pepe Escobar” on Somalia. More accurately, Pepe Escobar is a 9/11 Truther.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911truther; isolationism; kenya; libertarians; randpaultruthfile; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; somalia; waronterror; whywefight

1 posted on 10/01/2013 5:14:47 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Ron Paul Institute is full of shit. Somalis are thieves, murderers and born pirates. Ask any Kenyan. Ask any Ethiopian.


2 posted on 10/01/2013 5:18:34 AM PDT by steve8714 (Are we fighting for peace in Syria? Don't we already know what that is like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

this piece of work needs to keep his yap shut if he wants his son to have any credibility.


3 posted on 10/01/2013 5:20:29 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

4 posted on 10/01/2013 5:29:23 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

“The apple never falls far from the tree”, I say.

Rand Paul is a little too libertarianesque, IMO.


5 posted on 10/01/2013 5:37:06 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

I am too conservative to be considered a libertarian.

and

I am too libertarian to be considered a conservative.

constitutionalist fits me better. and I like Rand...but I like Ted Cruz much better.


6 posted on 10/01/2013 6:00:47 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Agreed. Ted Cruz preferred over Rand Paul.

FWIW, what scared me most about Ron Paul was the fanaticism of his followers. Almost Jonestown-like, as in

“Don’t you dare criticize our dear leader!!”

Just before 2008 campaign, I took an interstate exit; the cloverleaf grassy area was a sea of signs for many different political candidates. When I drove back a week later, they were all gone, replaced with am even denser sea of Ron Paul for President signs. As I said, scary........


7 posted on 10/01/2013 6:09:52 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If I were Rand Paul, I would somehow be distancing myself from this outrage as quickly as possible.


8 posted on 10/01/2013 6:13:32 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Paul followers will twist this around....


9 posted on 10/01/2013 6:18:50 AM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Yeah, when they started saying “Ron Paul is the ONLY hope for America”... well, that’s when you knew they were nuts.


10 posted on 10/01/2013 6:25:25 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
“The apple never falls far from the tree”

Are you saying that the views presented in this article represent the views of Rand Paul?

11 posted on 10/01/2013 6:30:38 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

“....FWIW, what scared me most about Ron Paul was the fanaticism of his followers. Almost Jonestown-like,....”

BINGO.
Rand Paul IS his daddy’s little boy.


12 posted on 10/01/2013 6:32:09 AM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Ron Paul’s blaming America for middle east problems and his refusal to defend America after 9/11 put him on my $h!tlist.

I would never vote for Ron....unless it was, say, him and Obama, which it can never be now.

Rand has that good, small L, libertarian thing going, but he could easily be a covert Ron, in reality.

I watch Rand closely.


13 posted on 10/01/2013 6:41:53 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rrrod
"Rand Paul IS his daddy’s little boy."

If you are going to attack Rand Paul for his fathers views then it is incumbent on you to provide some proof that Rand agrees with his father on content of the article. Otherwise you are simply another worthless poster spewing lies.

14 posted on 10/01/2013 6:49:59 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Blaming America (and Israel, no doubt) for the Nairobi Mall Massacre is a new low. Did RP blame America for radicalizing Osama bin Laden after 9-11? There were those who did.

Why is the blame never placed on those who actually did it? Meaning the bloody uncivilized Somali savages.


15 posted on 10/01/2013 6:56:34 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Ron Paul is an apologist for terrorists. Here he is on Iranian TV defending terrorists and bashing Israel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Y3-Cn5vIk


16 posted on 10/01/2013 7:01:44 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

nice try...you know Im right LOL.

Been thru this before


17 posted on 10/01/2013 7:53:40 AM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rrrod
If you were right then you would have no problem providing documentation that Rand Paul agrees with his father on the content of the article. The fact is, and I can provide documentation to back it up, that Rand Paul does not agree with his father on radical Islam, indeed Rand Paul sees radical Islam as a treat to the West and has often advocated a policy to contain radical Islam, much like the US sought to contain communism during the cold war.

Top 3 elected conservatives.
Cruz (TX) 100 100% (Average) 100% (Heritage) 100% (FreedomWorks)

Lee (UT) 100 100% (Average) 100% (Heritage) 100% (CFG) 100% (ACU) 100% (FreedomWorks)

Paul (KY) 99 99% (Average) 95% (Heritage) 100% (CFG) 100% (ACU) 100% (FreedomWorks)

Why do you smear an excellent conservative? Do you have something against conservatives?

18 posted on 10/01/2013 8:06:05 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson