Posted on 09/28/2013 1:44:10 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
News emerged a few weeks ago in Arabic media that yet another fatwa had called on practicing Muslim women to travel to Syria and offer their sexual services to the jihadis fighting to overthrow the secularist Assad government and install Islamic law. Reports attribute the fatwa to Saudi sheikh Muhammad al-Arifi, who, along with other Muslim clerics earlier permitted jihadis to rape Syrian women.
Muslim women prostituting themselves in this case is being considered a legitimate jihad because such women are making sacrificestheir chastity, their dignityin order to help apparently sexually-frustrated jihadis better focus on the war to empower Islam in Syria.
And it is prostitutionfor they are promised payment, albeit in the afterlife. The Koran declares that Allah has purchased of the believers their persons [their bodies] and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain (Yusuf Ali trans. 9:111).
On the basis of this fatwa, several young Tunisian Muslim girls traveled to Syria to be sex-jihadis. Video interviews of distraught parents bemoaning their daughters fates are on the Internet, including one of a father and mother holding a picture of their daughter: Shes only 16shes only 16! They brainwashed her! pleads the father.
Most recently, the Egyptian-based news service Masrawy published a video interview with Aisha, one of the Tunisian Muslim girls who went sex-jihading in Syria, only to regret her actions. While in Tunisia, Aisha said she met a Muslim woman who began talking to her about the importance of piety, including wearing the hijab; she then went on to talk about traveling to Syria to help the jihadis fight and kill infidels and make Allahs word supreme, adding that women who die would do so in the way of Allah and become martyrs
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
Funny!
IIRC, there was a member of the German parliament that drafted a bill that “marriage” would be a contract for 5? or 7? years that could be renewed or allowed to expire.
In this day and age, I can see merits of “marriage contracts”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.