RE: The judge’s decision is constitutional
No it isn’t. A judge cannot create a law that does not exist.
The people of NJ must vote and have it passed into law. That is the proper, constitutional way to do it.
While I admit that I don't know the details of this issue, I think that the judge is just interpreting state law. Corrections welcome.
Last I checked, we weren’t a rule by referendum mobocracy, where the Sheeple decided our right by majority.