International Law DOES NOT TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION.
“International Law DOES NOT TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION.”
You can keep shouting that but when the government no longer gives a shit what you think...well, you had best have Plan B ready.
I agree, and the most effective way I can object, is to point out what the reality will be, whether we buy in or not (Senate wise).
Our citizens need to sit up and smell the stench. Unless they react, we’re in serious trouble here.
I pointed out in a later post that Washington, D. C., and Chicago already have anti-gun laws. California has a slew of them. Are those Constitutional? Of course not.
Now, do you think there will be more or fewer municipalities with anti-gun laws after the U. N. ratifies it’s anti-gun treaty?
You know what the answer is. So do I. Does the fact that I understand this mean that I think U. N. law should trump the U. S. Constitution? NO.
It’s simply a grim reality. Follow the Kyoto trail to see how international law is implemented doing a bypass of Washington, D. C. And if you want to claim that’s different, it is. Now, what’s your explanation for W., D.C., Chicago, and California?
You can see the handwriting as well as I can. And no, I don’t think you’re advocating the U.N. superseding our own Constitution at all. It still stands to be a reality we’ll have to deal with, like it or not.
So I’m being as frank about it as I can, right now!