Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
I think this is a return to standards I was familiar with from the 70's and 80's.

If memory serves me right certain AFSCs in the USAF banned tattoos that were visible. Some were for obvious reasons like USAF ceremonial units. Some were related to special operations where "no identifiable marks or tattoos" was specified because the member needed to be "sanitized"...

In any case I seem to remember that forearm tattoos were limited in size, number and quality then. I do remember one of my troops getting an article 15 for a tattoo of a marijuana leaf.

In any case, the culture was different and not many had tattoos.

12 posted on 09/24/2013 10:20:23 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier

Some tattoos were intended to make one non draftable.


13 posted on 09/24/2013 10:24:51 AM PDT by ansel12 ( 'I'm on That New Obama Diet... Every Day I Let Vladimir Putin Eat My Lunch' .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

It’s my recollection, as well, that visible tattoos were banned in the early 70’s.


16 posted on 09/24/2013 10:32:46 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson