Posted on 09/23/2013 5:51:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said she would be "disappointed" in the American electorate if Hillary Clinton becomes a serious candidate for president in 2016.
The 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee argued Clinton would not be right for the role as commander in chief after four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, died last year in a terrorist attack against a U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
"If (Benghazi) doesn't have an impact on the 2016 presidential election, if she is a candidate, then America, I am very disappointed in our electorate," Palin said Sunday on Fox News, where she's a contributor.
She said "anyone who would just throw away 200 years of military ethos and leave our men behind to be murdered" should "never be considered as a commander in chief."
The lack of security at the consulate and the September 11, 2012 attack are poised to be a major point of contention by Republicans if Clinton decides to run for president. Clinton ultimately took responsibility for diplomats' safety, and was grilled before two congressional committees in January....
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...
Sarah Palin has.....Um.......Tina Fey?
And some Republicans offer more support for Her Thighness than for Sarah, sicking.
I’d like to see Tom Delay as president. He would be like Reagon and make a difference. Hellery Clinton is obviously a player which means she would continue to take us down.
She is the prior presidents wife, and we now have a community organizer who swindled his way into a senate seat for a whole hot minute. None of the fools would ever have been hired by a corporation, oh I guess zero would becau
se of affirmative action
Huge understatement...
Just saying, I realize 2016 is a ways off yet, but there is one female candidate a whole lot of patriotic Americans would vote for.
Just saying, Ms. Palin.
(I know, she prefers Mrs. Palin but I prefer this way)
:)
It’s actually Governor Palin. You keep the highest title you’ve achieved.
Hillary: ill suited for anything. In fact, just ill-suited period.
Hellary (Satan’s daughter) is as “ill-suited” to be president as Adolph Hitler was “ill-suited” to be a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
Hillary as President.
One disaster follows another.
Hillary is ill pantsuited for anything.
Thought this would be of interest.See post #2.
She will win.
0 is but a symptom. The idiocracy remains.
I think you're preferring the old southern 'Mizz' pronunciation, which is drawl for Mrs.
Ms. is a suffix made up by liberals for 'liberated womyn'.
Unfortunately, Sarah had better prepare herself to be hugely disappointed, then. We’re talking New America here.... Hillary has the presidency in her wrinkled, ice-cold, clawed hands, barring a crippling physical event.
I was going to say, that was the understatement of the century.
I know where you are coming from but I'll bet most women will say that wife and mother ranks higher than a mere politician. So will their husbands.
But I’m saying that what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If that is the standard for male officials, it should also be for female officials.
Only because people keep saying that. She “had it in the bag” in 2008, too, remember? Remind me how that turned out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.