Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leftist Hysteria Over Monsanto
Townhall.com ^ | September 23, 2013 | Rachel Alexander

Posted on 09/23/2013 5:34:19 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: maine yankee

Thank you!

This issue is not about GMO’s per se. It’s about CONTROL !

“Control the oil, you control the country. Control the food, you control the people.” - Henry Kissenger


61 posted on 09/23/2013 9:45:08 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- <<http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mase; Dr. Thorne
Over the last 12 years, there have been less than 150 legal actions between Monsanto and their contracted customers.

What about the number of Monsanto legal actions against those not under contract to them? Contract disputes are one thing, taking action against one not under contract because of DNA issues of crops is entirely different.

GMO crops are no big deal to me, the overbearing brutality of how Monsanto works is where I have my problem with them. The federal government has far too much control over our food production, whether it be with subsidies or siding with companies such as Monsanto and that federal control needs to be reined in.

I primarily plant heirloom crops, but do enjoy several specific hybrids which I regularly plant. But I also like playing with the seeds of those hybrids by saving some for another planting and seeing what I come up with. It's a fun, and harmless little hobby, but one that some frown upon, which is why Monsanto (among others) seek to patent their seeds and then come after those who have crops that show some of "their" DNA.

62 posted on 09/23/2013 9:48:15 AM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

It doesn’t matter if you call it hybridization, grafting, or cross breeding. They are all natural trait selection processes.


63 posted on 09/23/2013 9:51:34 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da; LearsFool; freebilly

LARGE International companies don’t die. They may fade away and change names but the money behind them is still buying government approvals, legislative votes and licenses to control sectors of the world economy.


64 posted on 09/23/2013 9:51:34 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- <<http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
That's an inane response.

How'd skipping all those science classes work out for you?

65 posted on 09/23/2013 9:53:33 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

It does by the traditional measures of calories burned—e.g., x calories burned per mile of swimming, x calories to consume per pound of weight gain or loss. That’s what I was getting at.


66 posted on 09/23/2013 9:55:03 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

CCD is nothing new.

http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/357439/bj-rn-lomborg-there-no-bee-crisis-greg-pollowitz

Honeybee deaths are also nothing new. The Breakthrough Institute reports that, in 1853, Lorenzo Langstroth, the 19th-century bee-keeper who invented the modern hive, described colonies that were “found, on being examined one morning, to be utterly deserted.

The comb was empty, and the only symptom of life was the poor queen herself.” In 1891 and 1896, large clusters of bees vanished in a case known as May Disease.

In the 1960s, bees vanished mysteriously in Texas, Louisiana and California. In 1975, a similar epidemic cropped up in Australia, Mexico and 27 U.S. states. There were heavy losses in France from 1998 to 2000 and also in California in 2005, just two years before CCD was first diagnosed.


67 posted on 09/23/2013 10:01:16 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
e.g., x calories burned per mile of swimming, x calories to consume per pound of weight gain or loss.

You might have to walk more to burn the same calories, the calories still balance.

3 guys eats 2000 calories a day. One burns 1900, he gains weight. One burns 2000, he remains the same. The third burns 2100, he loses weight.

It doesn't matter if the different amounts burned are because they exercise differently, their metabolism is different or their hormones are different.

Eat more than you burn, you'll gain weight.

68 posted on 09/23/2013 10:01:31 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
What about the number of Monsanto legal actions against those not under contract to them?

Maybe you could list them here. Every judgment I've seen clearly shows that the defendant violated the agreement/law. Any grower who purchases Monsanto patented seeds has to sign a Monsanto Technology/Stewardship Agreement.

Even though the left, and some FReepers, argue that Monsanto is evil personified, farmers choose Monsanto's products of their own free will year after year. There has to be a reason for this, and maybe it's because Monsanto delivers the products that makes farmers more productive, and their farms more profitable. Monsanto does not place a gun to their customer's heads and force them to buy their seeds.

Monsanto aggressively protects their intellectual property. So what? So does Apple. You never hear the left calling Apple the spawn of Satan because they protect their property. Go figure.

69 posted on 09/23/2013 10:04:05 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
So you want the FDA to do what?

Maybe something besides provide a shield for their former employers (Monsanto, et al)? Then we might get the whole truth about how polluted our food supply has become.
70 posted on 09/23/2013 10:06:55 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mase; RipSawyer
It doesn’t matter if you call it hybridization, grafting, or cross breeding. They are all natural trait selection processes.

I'm not inclined to agree with you here about grafting. The only grafting for trait selection processes I have ever been aware of need assistance. Hybridization and cross breeding most usually occur because of natural pollination, although both are more commonly done now under controlled circumstances by humans.

71 posted on 09/23/2013 10:11:16 AM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mase
It doesn’t matter if you call it hybridization, grafting, or cross breeding. They are all natural trait selection processes.

...Unlike what Monsanto is doing.

There really isn't any difference. One just gets you there faster than the other.

So fish and soybeans would eventually meet, fall in love, and raise lots of little...what, chimeras? Come on now. The difference is as huge as Soros's profits in Big Ag.
72 posted on 09/23/2013 10:12:41 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mase

All I asked was how many more years you have until you get your gold watch. To that you ask about me supposedly skipping science classes? How many logic and reading comprehension classes did you have to drop to keep from screwing your GPA?


73 posted on 09/23/2013 10:14:32 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

>>“This sounds awfully like the anti-fracking nonsense.”

Bingo. When the left gets this upset about something, you can be sure there is another agenda below the surface that they don’t want to talk about. With fracking, they really want to stop us from finding new sources of fuel, because they don’t want a strong, energy independent America.

With the anti-GMO hysteria, the left is trying to minimize our food production, to both weaken us, and to reduce the world food supply as a backdoor to population control.<<

BULLSHIT!


74 posted on 09/23/2013 10:16:04 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- <<http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog; Mase

Maybe he’s already retired from Monsanto, and taken up his post at the FDA. ;-)


75 posted on 09/23/2013 10:16:31 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Mase

What are you talking about? It seems like you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about or maybe I misunderstand your use of words like grafting and hybridization.

Let me provide an explanation and clarification. Genetic modification is the use of virus to inject foreign DNA into plants. This is done in a lab. Virus already do this in nature but God, or nature, or our balanced system of life, decides on how this works. Do you want a company with a history of corruption and a total lack of ethics wielding this power?

Grafting is taking parts of a plant and getting it to grow on another. Many plants are gender specific, like cherry tree’s. You take a female cherry tree and graft male parts on to it so it can self pollinate. Now you dont need multiple tree’s for production. In grafting, there is no exchange of genetic information.

Many of the new designer hot peppers are created through hybridization, selective breeding and cross breeding. There is no lab, there is no injection of animal DNA or god knows what. You take pollen from one plant and pollinate another through natural methods. Even feminizing plants uses natural methods.

Norman Borlaug and his “Green Revolution” used cross breeding and natural methods. He wasn’t splicing genes in a lab.


76 posted on 09/23/2013 10:19:27 AM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mase
Monsanto does not place a gun to their customer's heads and force them to buy their seeds.

Kindly reread what I wrote - I said nothing about customers who bought Monsanto seeds - I spoke of those that Monsanto claimed had Monsanto DNA show in their crops. I no longer have the cases at the ready, and there weren't many - but there have been some, and Monsanto prevailed.

I don't care how sterile Monsanto claims their seeds to be, DNA can still be transferred - that is basic science.

77 posted on 09/23/2013 10:21:32 AM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mase
Natural grafting occurs, that is true. However, there are all kinds of problems that can come from it. Grafting of plants by humans, on the other hand, is responsible for most of the varieties of food you enjoy today.

You are a bluffer and liar. Grafting is done for fruit trees and grapes like the ones I have. No one grafts wheat or vegetables. I have read about a few people grafting tomatoes and eggplants but that is it!!!  Wheat, beans and vegetables and others are bred via careful pollination and selection of winner specimens and using their seeds. Idiot!

78 posted on 09/23/2013 10:24:37 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Not wanting to be too crude here, but there is also the factor of how much is kept in the system to be burned or stored—and how much is passed on through. Both the option to burn or store and to pass through or use are probably affected by more factors than we’ve yet come to fully understand.


79 posted on 09/23/2013 10:27:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Be crude, it’s still calories in - calories out.


80 posted on 09/23/2013 10:35:08 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson