Where does he go to get his reputation back?
“...Where does he go to get his reputation back?...”
Well, for one thing - make him Speaker of the House again... he was maliciously and unfairly interdicted in that duty, and should have the opportunity to finish out that term.
It’s only FAIR, after all...
He’s a good man. We need him back.
Nowhere. How many news outlets will even report on this? He will forever be remembered as “the disgraced House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.” That is the disgrace!
“Where does he go to get his reputation back?”
Back on Dancing with the Stars!!!
He doens’t the dirty little truth about the injustice system is that if you lawyer up, right, wrong, law or no law you can destroy anyone you want.
This is what we now have for a “justice system” so many judges with in any jurisdiction it’s easy to cherry pick anyone of them to come to any verdict your rival’s like.
Furthermore, because both the guilty and the innocent pay, and the cost of the modern investigative standard of ‘justice’ keeps going thou the roof. Anyone who might want to shut you down doesn’t even have win the case. The costs of your deference is enough to bankrupt any normal person, and the mere acquisition to effectually destroy almost anyone else.
It is indeed the sheer size of the injustice system that is at the root of the first problem as compounded by the effective size of any given judges domain. Thus permitting cherry picking of judges.
Solution cherry picking:
1: Reduced the number of judges.
2: Draw the judges domains into smaller units so that your always garrenteed to get one particular judge for any given crime.
3: Randomize the judge selection in existing multi-judge domains units to remove the capability to cherry pick judges.
Resolving the cost issues is more difficult, as it requires reducing the burden of technological proof, and using more simple & older methods. However I argue we should not bother with that as the real problem is the innocent being persecuted. The obvious answer is letting the looser bare the costs in all circumstances.