Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer

So? Stopping him from purchasing the *assault rifle* didn’t prevent him from killing more than a dozen people now did it? Idiots.

He had mental issues and should have been under CLOSE surveillance.


52 posted on 09/17/2013 7:35:07 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: madison10

I agree that preventing him from buying the assault rifle did not prevent Obama’s son from going on this killing spree.

However, we cannot put every wackjob in America under close surveillance. Just not possible.

I believe the answer is to let the people under the 2A arm themselves and be able to protect themselves wherever they are. These “gun free zones” are nothing more than “free kill zones”.

A wackjob hell bent on taking any modern day firearm and a couple pockets of magazines or bags of shotshells is free to wreak havoc for several minutes until someone shows up to give him a dirt nap or for him to stop his own mayhem. The people MUST be allowed to protect themselves.

There is no such thing as a “gun free zone” to me. It does not exist. If there is one of those whacky machines that I have to go through.....I do not go there....end of story.

I will not be disarmed.


66 posted on 09/18/2013 2:24:15 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson