Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buckeye McFrog
I recently observed a gun control debate that went like this:

"Nobody is going to take your damned guns away from you, but a BACKGROUND CHECK will mean that less guns will get into the hands of people who SHOULD NOT HAVE THEM. Right now, you're not even required to show ID in some places to get a gun thanks to the 'gun show loophole'. What's so UNREASONABLE about background checks?!"

"What do you think a 'background check' really consists of? There's some magical oracle of information where we can query whether a person is a lunatic or not? Or a criminal? You have states handing out driver's licenses to illegal aliens who present no other form of ID and get an official driver's license just by signing another document where they swear they are who they say they are. Do you think an 'identity loophole' like that would make a 'background check' more or less valid than a US Military 'Secret' security clearance like the Navy Yard shooter had?"

"Okay, then just forget the whole thing. If background checks won't work, we just need to go door to door sweeping up all the guns."

"You go out to your politicians and demand that. I'll even handcraft you a protest sign which calls for precisely that."

16 posted on 09/17/2013 8:26:26 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid

I shut several Liberals up after Newtown by asking them if they were volunteering to go out into Bullitt County KY to go door to door confiscating firearms.


21 posted on 09/17/2013 8:30:02 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson