Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

You are walking a slippery slope here.

Medical records are, for the moment, still private. The subset of mental health records is even “more” private. A medical provider cannot release mental health records unless there is a signed release that specifically states that they can be released. After the implementation of owebamacare the fedgov will likely have access to ALL of your health records any time they want.

So who decides if someone is crazy and shouldn’t be allowed to own a weapon? This regime believes that Tea Party, conservative, freedom loving Americans and Veterans are subversive threats to their ultimate goals of power and total control. That makes us all crazy in their eyes.

Who’s side are you on?


53 posted on 09/17/2013 7:44:45 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: 43north

Well said. Good point.


57 posted on 09/17/2013 7:48:55 AM PDT by murrie (Mark Levin: Prosecuting stupidity nightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: 43north
Mental issues that rise to the level of a concern do IMO need to be made public into a general data base so they can not get guns.

In this case, a guy who uses excuses to shoot others and who almost killed someone before this with a gun should have been on some national data base for sure.

Now unless you want to lobotomize the mental, we have to have the mental documented and restricted from certain activities.
Do you want one as a crossing guard?
Do you want them having sensitive security clearances?

91 posted on 09/17/2013 9:23:51 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson