Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calljack

“In an attempt to be everything to everybody, it became nothing to anybody.”

You put your finger on the problem. In order to get funded a project promises that it can do every mission and therefore it can get the funding of those other projects that are more specialized. (The more funding you get the more powerful you are.) FCS did this. One vehicle was supposed to be modifiable to do every vehicle’s function. Main battle tank, mobile hospital, ambulance, scout vehicle...It was ridiculous. The Army spent more money than if it had designed all new special purpose vehicles and they ended up with NOTHING.


7 posted on 09/14/2013 9:42:07 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather
I remember when I was working on the FCS pre-contract efforts. Some egghead told us how they had a deterent that would stop a long-rod penetrator from destroying a 25-ton FCS combat vehicle. We asked what Sir Issac Newton had to say about it, other than the energy had to go somewhere, other than putting the intact vehicle upside down in the ditch, with the crew turned to jelly.

Dead silence.

14 posted on 09/14/2013 10:13:36 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson