Hmmmm
1 posted on
09/13/2013 12:19:46 AM PDT by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2 posted on
09/13/2013 12:20:29 AM PDT by
Nachum
(I am Breitbartacus!)
To: Nachum
I was just talking to some conservative expats here in Beijing. Some of them are Brits and they thought the Wall Street Journal was Left of the Guardian so they refused to read it. I told them it was owned by Rupert Murdoch and they thought I was joking. Just goes to show you that conservative expats in China, including myself, consider the WSJ a lame newspaper. The Financial Times is a better newspaper for global business news anyway.
3 posted on
09/13/2013 12:28:00 AM PDT by
TexGrill
(Don't mess with Texas)
To: Nachum
and yet; that "pesky" 9/2 conversation was noted, not explained...
WSJ: "let's not rock Kerry's boat and/or get Juan pissed...
the government/media template must survive. "
5 posted on
09/13/2013 12:34:46 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
To: Nachum
I saw this lady on Cavuto and the way she dismissed al queda elements among the Syrian rebels had me on alert.
After the Egyptian debacle I am disgusted politicians for intervening aren’t more cautious.
7 posted on
09/13/2013 12:58:35 AM PDT by
RginTN
To: Nachum
The WSJ is a Neo-Con rag.
8 posted on
09/13/2013 1:38:30 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: Nachum
10 posted on
09/13/2013 1:45:30 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
