Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vince Ferrer
We know the opposite is actually true. When comparing hunter/gatherer skeletons with the earliest farmers, agriculture was not an advance in health. Farmers died younger, and were shorter and less healthy. The big mystery is why, and why we kept doing it if it was not an improvement.

Aw, nuts! Thank you, Vince Ferrer! I didn't know that.

Why did we continue to pursue agriculture? Hmmm! I wonder whether it could have had something to do with slavery. That's just a wild guess, but...

20 posted on 09/12/2013 8:51:55 PM PDT by Standing Wolf (No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Standing Wolf

More children live with agriculture. More children live means larger populations.

Jared Diamond’s “Guns Germs and Steel” recounted a case where an agricultural people conquered a hunter-gatherer people, but the island wasn’t suited to agriculture, so they converted to hunter-gatherers.


30 posted on 09/12/2013 9:42:50 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson