Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry on Syria: how a gaffe could stop a war
The Guardian ^ | September 10, 2013 | Jonathan Freedland

Posted on 09/10/2013 4:30:48 AM PDT by maggief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: mad_as_he$$

Yup.

His face could stop a clock.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.


21 posted on 09/10/2013 5:42:08 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

WaPo: Most important ‘takeaway’ what Obama said to @DianeSawyer : “absolutely” back from brink IF #Syria gives up #CW wapo.st/1ez3Sz8


I’ve been in IT since 1983 and that looks like computer code. What does it say in english?


22 posted on 09/10/2013 5:43:35 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Apparently Unplanned Comment????????


23 posted on 09/10/2013 5:43:46 AM PDT by jacob allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Supposedly Barkie acknowledges that Putin brought up international control of Syria’s chemical weapons at the G20 meeting.

So when Kerry echoes it a day or so thereafter, was that a “gaffe” or a signal of accepting the proposal? The ambiguity allowed Putin to lock in the latter, thus reversing looming disaster for Russia’s position in the Middle East, while making the U.S. look like a toothless bully. O Barak, tak durak.


24 posted on 09/10/2013 5:55:40 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

There are many ways to become entangled in a nasty civil war, with thousands of American boots on the ground.

Remember Beirut? We went in as “peacekeepers” but in the end their was no peace, we took fire from the Shia neighborhoods south of the airport and we fired back.

The rest is history.

Beirut was just one city, and our “peacekeeping” (sic) mission didn’t involve securing dozens of chemical weapons depots. Syrian “peacekeeping” would be 100X Beirut, and in the end, we’ll be fully embroiled in that war.


25 posted on 09/10/2013 5:56:45 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

WaPo: Most important ‘takeaway’ what Obama said to Diane Sawyer: “absolutely” back from brink IF Syria gives up CW

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/posttv/politics/obamas-interviews-in-3-minutes/2013/09/09/039d965e-19b7-11e3-82ef-a059e54c49d0_video.html

From the Guardian:

Nevertheless, this latest initiative deserves to be taken seriously because it gives all the key players something they need. Crucially, it would allow the antagonists to step back from the brink without losing face.

#

I posted the WaPo (via Reuters) because it relates to the Guardian article, and is an incredibly weak takeaway from Obama’s media blitz.


26 posted on 09/10/2013 5:57:02 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

How does one identify “good guys” in that god-awful mess with so many different rebel groups and even foreign fighters on the side of and not taking orders from Assad?


27 posted on 09/10/2013 5:57:41 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

“Supposedly Barkie acknowledges that Putin brought up international control of Syria’s chemical weapons at the G20 meeting.”

Kerry stepped in it. Purposely? Who knows. The State Department, Jen Psaki, was quick to call Kerry’s comments “rhetorical”. Then Hillary reverses Psaki, acknowledging Kerry’s “gaffe” as fact.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/09/hillary-clinton-articulates-administrations-new-line-syria/69204/

“Now, if the regime immediately surrendered its stockpiles to international control as was suggested by Secretary Kerry and the Russians, that would be an important step. But this cannot be another excuse for delay or obstruction. And Russia has to support the international community’s efforts sincerely, or be held to account.”

#

Was Kerry attempting to preempt Hillary?


28 posted on 09/10/2013 6:09:01 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

“You never want a good crisis to go to waste.”

Agree, but in this case it was a disaster for O and K.


29 posted on 09/10/2013 6:12:29 AM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Sending "peacekeepers" into Syria to guard chem depots is a fool's errand.

We also went into Beirut as neutral "peacekeepers," but soon we were taking sniper and mortar fire from the Shia slums south of the airport where the Americans were located. Then it was "game on" with involvement in the Lebanese civil war, and we know how that ended. Beirut was a walk in the park compared to securing Syrian chem depots.

And like in Beirut, all it will take is an "end times" oriented Iranian-backed Shia Hezbollah commander to fire on us, and we'll be involved in the Syrian civil war up to our eyeballs. Except this time, we could be facing Iranian troops and Russian weapon systems.


30 posted on 09/10/2013 6:17:42 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Saying ‘No’ to George Patton back in Spring 1945 also stopped a war. Unfortunately, saying ‘No’ also resulted in tens of millions living under Soviet domination for the next 45 years.


31 posted on 09/10/2013 6:24:25 AM PDT by Hoodat (BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

A gaffe, an incredibly small gaffe.


32 posted on 09/10/2013 6:25:40 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

You can’t tell. And anybody who wants to drag the USA into a shooting war in Syria just has to lob a few mortar rounds at future “peacekeepers” the way they did in Beirut.


33 posted on 09/10/2013 6:33:00 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

I think he has the Teressa Heinz disease. It is called being a drunk bloated creep.


34 posted on 09/10/2013 6:37:18 AM PDT by Truth2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson