Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fearsome new White House talking point on Syria: Our attack will be “unbelievably small”
Hot Air ^ | 11:21 am on September 9, 2013 | Allahpundit

Posted on 09/09/2013 7:10:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Via the Free Beacon, Ed mentioned this already but a foreign-policy soundbite this immortal — maybe the greatest since “leading from behind” — requires video, especially with Assad claiming that his response might not be quite as teeny tiny. Kerry’s Syria pronouncements are aimed at three audiences — the majority of Congress, which worries about mission creep if they greenlight this fiasco; the McCainian hawkish minority, which wants mission creep in the sense that they want more support for the rebels in the name of regime change; and of course Assad and Iran, who need to have the fear of God put into them if they’re going to think twice about using gas again. How do you satisfy each of those audiences in your public pronouncements if you’re the Secretary of State? I don’t know, and neither does this guy, apparently. Last week he assured Chris Hayes that one happy consequence of U.S. intervention will be to empower moderate rebels as an alternative to the jihadis, which made it sound like America’s goals in this were broader than simply bloodying Assad’s nose for using WMD. Good news for McCainians, not so good for everyone else, and it’s that “everyone else” in Congress that’s their big problem right now. So here’s Waffles waffling back towards the doves by promising that any attack will be “unbelievably small,” which is just what you want to hear if you’re prepared to gamble your House seat on a big show of American muscle abroad.

And it’s not just Kerry. Different White House actors are saying different things to please/frighten their various audiences. Alex Massie cuts through it at the Spectator UK:

But since the purpose of the raid is – and no-one sensible disputes this, I think – just to send a message to Assad and other tyrants that the use of chemical weapons is something up with which the international community will not put it makes very little sense to send a message that’s so unbelievably small neither Assad nor his counterparts elsewhere will feel the need to read or otherwise get it. And if the message is not received it has not, in this instance, been sent either.

And since, moreover, the case for military action also rests upon the sense that American (and western) credibility is on the line vis a vis Syria (and all future foreign entanglements) it seems foolish to make a virtue out of the fact that this action is actually going to be, as Kerry puts it, unbelievably small. What price credibility then?

Here’s a more colorful way to think about it:

The strike, as envisioned, would be limited in the number of targets and done within a day or two. It could be completed in one fell swoop with missiles, said one senior official familiar with the weapons involved. A smaller, follow-on strike could be launched if targets aren’t sufficiently damaged.

A second senior official, who has seen the most recent planning, offered this metaphor to describe such a strike: If Assad is eating Cheerios, we’re going to take away his spoon and give him a fork. Will that degrade his ability to eat Cheerios? Yes. Will it deter him? Maybe. But he’ll still be able to eat Cheerios.

As goofy as that it, it’s a nifty way to sum up what they’re going for here. They don’t want to stop him from eating Cheerios altogether, just make things a bit harder for him so that they can semi-plausibly claim success later. The McCainians will trumpet that we’ve “degraded” Assad’s capabilities, doves will sigh with relief that we haven’t been dragged in deeper, and the White House can rest assured that they didn’t do anything (like killing Assad) that would cause too much extra chaos in Syria. Remember, the U.S. goal here isn’t regime change, as much as O pays lip services to that from time to time. The goal is to negotiate a settlement between Sunnis and Alawites that will preserve an uneasy balance of power. Kill Assad and that probably becomes less likely, either because the regime will start to implode despite Iran’s best efforts to hold it together or because the Shiites, as retaliation, will begin to behave even more ruthlessly. If either side “wins” on the battlefield by rolling over the other, sectarian cleansing is likely to result. The White House figures, probably rightly, that if a peace deal is reached, having Assad in charge to restrain the Shiites will be more helpful in preventing that cleansing than taking him out now would be.

Your homework assignment is the RAND study concluding that there’s no guarantee that a conflict designed to be “unbelievably small” would stay that way for long. Exit question via Jim Geraghty: Didn’t the White House … just expand the Pentagon’s target list in Syria last week? Cruise missiles, jets, bombers — when Kerry says “unbelievably small,” maybe he means that literally. I.e. when they call it “small,” it’s unbelievable.

Update: Maverick is unhappy:


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; kerry; lebanon; maheralassad; potassiumfluoride; russia; sarin; sodiumfluoride; syria; thebrotherdidit; unitedkingdom; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Video at the Hot Air Web Site.
1 posted on 09/09/2013 7:10:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

In this case I think they are planning to shoot a goat and a stray camel.


2 posted on 09/09/2013 7:11:44 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; TigersEye; justa-hairyape; onyx; blam; ..
Notice the careful coordination of todays pronouncement's...on Syria.
3 posted on 09/09/2013 7:12:52 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Sept 9, 2013 -- What a day of reversals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wonkowasright

Very Likely.....LOL!


4 posted on 09/09/2013 7:13:40 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Sept 9, 2013 -- What a day of reversals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“Unbelievably small...” and so are their “members”.


5 posted on 09/09/2013 7:17:39 PM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...is something up with which the international community will not put...

LOL...a Brit channeling Winston! Most excellent.

6 posted on 09/09/2013 7:19:29 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
John Kerry: Our attack will be “unbelievably small.”

Just like your purported manhood, eh, Mr. Secretary?
7 posted on 09/09/2013 7:20:43 PM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wonkowasright

>> I think they are planning to shoot a goat

Well, yeah, but they’ll sterilize a terrorist with the same shot.

It’s not much, but Jean Kerree DID say “unbelievably small”.


8 posted on 09/09/2013 7:21:33 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Lob a cherry bomb?


9 posted on 09/09/2013 7:22:57 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We’re America stoopit.

We don’t do anything small.

Why bother?


10 posted on 09/09/2013 7:23:09 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

11 posted on 09/09/2013 7:23:38 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

A damn disgrace. History will judge these ass clowns.


12 posted on 09/09/2013 7:25:05 PM PDT by MattinNJ (It's over Johnny. The America you knew is gone. Denial serves no purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Maybe some unfortunate “vetted enemy” in Syria will have a grain of rice embedded in his butt, like the injury John F’n Kerry got in Viet Nam. That’s incredibly small.


13 posted on 09/09/2013 7:26:04 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"to send a message to Assad and other tyrants that the use of chemical weapons is something up with which the international community will not put . . ."

I was about to put on my Language Police hat and call this guy out on his faulty grammar. Then it became clear to me that he did it deliberately, in order to make fun of Obama, Kerry, and the other idiots he is criticizing.

It clearly is a deliberate echo of a famous, comic pronouncement by Winston Churchill:

"Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put."

14 posted on 09/09/2013 7:27:41 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
about the size of Kerry's brain...
15 posted on 09/09/2013 7:29:21 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I keep thinking about 5 O Clock Charlie from MASH when Kerry and Obama talk about the strike


16 posted on 09/09/2013 7:30:33 PM PDT by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Our attack will be “unbelievably small”


17 posted on 09/09/2013 7:33:03 PM PDT by Flag_This (Term limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal

Mooch could confirm this for us; as if we didn’t already know.

But given her considerable size.... OK, I’m not going there.


18 posted on 09/09/2013 7:33:10 PM PDT by MrKatykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; All

Obama’s interest in invading non-enemy Syria has nothing to do with Syria, poison gas, or children.

Obama’s interest in bombing non-enemy Syria has everything to do with creating a long-lasting, controversial, DISTRACTION for Congress in order to keep Congress from defunding Obama”care”/Boehnerkare.

Obama’s “Red Herring” for the 9-11 Benghazi Massacre Coverup was Susan Rice’s fake Video story.

Obama’s “Red Herring” for distracting Congress until Obama”care”/ Boehnerkare kicks in October 1 is Obama’s “Crossing HIS personal Red Line” distraction speech.

Obama speaks only for Obama, not the US Federal Government or America.

REMEMBER BENGHAZI !

_____________________________________

“Jellyfish Spine” Boehner as Speaker of the House is essential to Obama’s continued unchallenged destruction of the US Constitution.

Nothing will change as long as cave-in artists Boehner and Cantor are in leadership roles in the US House of Representatives.

If Boehner is replaced as Speaker with a fighter such as Col. Allen West, then the Articles of Impeachment for B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, can be quickly issued.

The problem is not with Obama, as he is just doing what Communist Tyrants are trained to do.

The problem is not with Boehner, as he loves to lose and wallow in the disgrace of being the worst Speaker of the House, EVER.

The problem lies with our sorry, spineless, RINOs in the House who refuse to replace Boehner with a proven fighter.

BTW, the members of the House can choose anybody to be their Speaker, even if that person is not a current Member of the House.

Tick-tock, long-time House RINOs, tick-tock - - - - .

_____________

Obama and Holder are publicly speaking about their ‘plan of the week’ that are just more smokescreen distractions to divert attention away from the incompetent manner Obama has handled his day job.

The best indicator of a PHONY ADMINISTRATION is the number of its REAL SCANDALS.

Commie Tyrant Obama’s current talking points are thus smokescreen distractions for the products of Obama’s first 4 years in office:
* Refusal to close US Southern Border to Mexican illegal alien invaders
* No known un-forged records of Place of Birth
* No known un-forged records of University grades
* Benghazi Massacre
* Dereliction of Duty as CIC during Benghazi Massacre
* Cover up of Benghazi Massacre
* Destruction of Seal Team Six
* Cover up of Fast and Furious murder of US Border Agent by Exec. Order
* IRS-Obama’care” Commune Death Grip on Wealth and Health
* NSA-Gestapo Death Grip on all citizen’s communications
* Use of Courts against News Media
* Use of Supreme Court to install Un-Constitutional Obama’care’ Tax
* Destruction of the US Coal Industry
* Refusal to permit XL Pipeline construction
* Trillion Dollar a year Federal Overspending
* Monthly violations of the US Constitution by Obama
* Use of Exec. Orders to bypass Congress.

REPLACE sniveling coward Speaker Boehner with a FIGHTER!

It is time to IMPEACH Tyrant B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro.
_______________________

Tyrant B. Hussein Obama, (aka Barry Soetoro), continues his unopposed efforts to expand Totalitarian Obamanation in Liberty-based America.

Where are the Republican opponents of Tyrant Obama?

Why have the Articles of Impeachment for Tyrant Obama not been issued by US House Speaker Boehner, or Pro-Welfare Republicans Cantor or Ryan?

Have House and Senate Pro-Welfare Republicans formed a cave-in pact with Pro-Welfare Democrats to protect Tyrant Obama?

The main thing that Speaker Boehner is afraid of is being blamed for doing his job.

Speaker Boehner’s job now is to shut down the NON-ESSENTIAL parts of the US Federal Government until Obama’care’ is ABOLISHED, and keep it shut down for however long it takes.

Obama will continue to ruin America as long as Boehner is Speaker of the US House of Represenatives.

Four + years of Boehner has proven Boehner to be unfit to combat Tyrant Obama.

It is now up to the Members of the House to replace Boehner so that the new Speaker can shut down the non-essential parts of the US Federal Government ASAP in order to ABOLISH Obama’care.’


19 posted on 09/09/2013 7:39:38 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

How small? So small you will never know it happened.


20 posted on 09/09/2013 7:40:49 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson