Posted on 09/09/2013 1:22:59 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul vehemently opposes going to war with Syria, and he outlined his thoughts clearly in a letter to his fellow senators on Monday.
As a libertarian, Paul believes that America should stay out of most foreign affairs, and in general promotes a smaller government that does not take action when there appears to be no immediate security risk.
Paul also questioned the wisdom of taking limited action, as Obama has suggested. The president has previously vowed not to put any boots on the ground, and to make any attack narrow in scope to avoid a full-fledged war presumably in an attempt to convince the American people as well as foreign leaders that any actions will not bring about a repeat of the failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In the letter, Paul quotes Casper Weinberger, secretary of state for the Reagan administration, who said, U.S. troops should only be committed wholeheartedly and with the clear intention of winning. Otherwise, troops should not be committed.
The letter also states, "I disagree strongly with unlimited executive power to initiate war. But I have some sympathy for the argument that once war commences, the executive should not be hamstrung by a narrowed ability to execute that war."
(Excerpt) Read more at opposingviews.com ...
Rand Paul should have pointed out that no U.S. interests were involved, that is the only reason U.S. forces are to be used.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.