Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cherokee1; Hardraade; kingattax; InABunkerUnderSF; Vendome; Netz; dforest; PoloSec; Gen.Blather; ...

47 posted on 09/08/2013 5:57:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I aim to raise a million plus for Gov. Palin. What'll you do?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

“I read it in the newspaper” or, “I read it on the internet” does not make it TRUE. There is NO WAY I believe odumbo when he tells us they did.

I have no argument that Britian may have sent sarin to Syria. Certaily Syria COULD have used the sarin to create the poison gas.

It still does not PROVE to me that they actually USED (meaning “fired”) weapons with that gas inside.

The rebels version of how the gas was used is more likely.


48 posted on 09/09/2013 5:16:49 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So?

Does this prove the Brits sold NaF for the known purpose of making sarin?

Hardly.

Dual use.


49 posted on 09/09/2013 7:32:14 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson