To: Tailgunner Joe
In war, thousands of people are often killed in a single event - a ship is sunk, a city is carpet-bombed, or an atomic bomb is dropped. As reprehensible as it is, is use of poison gas any worse than the use of nuclear weapons? Is it any worse than lining a group of people in front of a wall or mass grave and machine-gunning them?
Why is it that some focus upon the instrumentality used rather than upon the perpetrator of the act?
Would the outrage of this administration be as strident if Assad's troops were going village to village and decimating the residents as Hitler did at Lidice?
|
|
America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi! |
|
|
Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!
Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)
20 posted on
09/02/2013 7:58:29 PM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: ConorMacNessa
"Would it make you feel any better, little girl, if they was pushed out of windows?"
21 posted on
09/02/2013 8:00:35 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: ConorMacNessa
Obama and the GOP have swept Benghazi under the rug because
both parties have blood on their hands.
23 posted on
09/02/2013 8:03:51 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
(Stop Worrying And Just Learn To Love The Bomb!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson