Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Links at the linked article.
1 posted on 08/30/2013 9:21:42 AM PDT by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: shove_it

No, they were the Demokkkrats. And the Republicans have let them get away with the narrative. The Demokkkrats now run the government plantation. And their followers are too lazy to learn any different.


2 posted on 08/30/2013 9:25:35 AM PDT by Qwackertoo (Going into Politic Free Zone Momma Grizzly hibernation for a while after this week, maybe forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

FROM ANN COULTER:

http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2013/02/13/white-liberals-tell-black-lies-about-civil-rights-n1512152/page/full

White Liberals Tell Black Lies About Civil Rights

EXCERPT:

99 members of Congress signed the “Southern Manifesto” denouncing the court’s ruling in Brown vs Board of Education. Two were Republicans. Ninety-seven were Democrats.

As president, Eisenhower pushed through the 1957 Civil Rights Act and the 1960 Civil Rights Act. He established the Civil Rights Commission. It was Eisenhower, not Truman, who fully desegregated the military.

Meanwhile, the Brown decision was being openly defied by the Democratic governor of Arkansas (and Bill Clinton pal), Orval Faubus, who refused to admit black students to Little Rock Central High School.

Liberals act as if Eisenhower’s sending federal troops to Little Rock was like Nixon going to China. No, it was like Nixon going to California.

Only someone who knows no history could proclaim, as Tanenhaus did, that the 1957 act “wasn’t great, it wasn’t what LBJ gave us, but it was something.”

If Eisenhower’s 1957 civil rights bill was weak, it was because of one man: Lyndon B. Johnson. As Robert Caro explains in his book, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” it was LBJ who stripped the bill of its enforcement provisions. Even after that, the bill was still opposed by 18 senators — all of them Democrats.

To the easily astounded Chris Matthews, Tanenhaus breathlessly remarked, “Not one Republican voted against that bill!” — as if the 1957 Civil Right Act was a Democratic idea and they were delighted to get any Republican support at all.

Imagine a modern German historian saying: “Remember — it wasn’t just Germans who opposed the Holocaust. The English and Americans did too!” Such a historian would be beaten bloody, quite rightly so.

The 1957 bill was sent to Congress by Eisenhower, passed with the intervention of Vice President Richard Nixon, and opposed exclusively by Democrats. Not “Southern Democrats,” not “conservative Democrats,” but Democrats, such as Wayne Morse of Oregon, Warren Magnuson of Washington, James Murray of Montana, Mike Mansfield of Montana and Joseph O’Mahoney of Wyoming.

With absolutely no evidence (because there is none), Tanenhaus then asserted that Republicans decided “they were not going to be pro-civil rights. ... They were going to side with the Southern oppressors.” Cretin Matthews seconded this gibberish by saying Nixon was “playing the Southern Strategy electorally with Strom Thurmond and those boys.”

Who exactly does Matthews imagine he means by “Strom Thurmond and those boys”? Every single segregationist in the Senate was a Democrat. Only one of them ever became a Republican: Strom Thurmond.

The rest remained not only Democrats, but quite liberal Democrats. These included such liberal luminaries as Harry Byrd, Robert Byrd, Allen Ellender, Albert Gore Sr., J. William Fulbright, Walter F. George, Russell Long and Richard Russell.

Fulbright was Bill Clinton’s mentor. Gore was “Al Jazeera” Gore’s father. Sam Ervin headed Nixon’s impeachment committee. The segregationists who were in the Senate in the ‘50s were rabid Joe McCarthy opponents. In the ‘60s, they opposed the Vietnam War and supported LBJ’s Great Society programs. In the ‘90s, they got 100 percent ratings from NARAL Pro-Choice America.

These “Southern oppressors” were liberal Democrats when they were racists and remained liberal Democrats after they finally stopped being racists (in public). If Republicans had a racist “Southern strategy,” it didn’t work on the racists.

Nor did Nixon — or Reagan — ever win over segregationist voters. Republicans only began sweeping the South after the segregationists died.

Even as late as 1980, when Reagan won a 44-state landslide, the old segregationists were still voting Democrat. Although Reagan handily won Southern states that had been voting Republican since the ‘20s, he barely won — or lost — the Goldwater states.

According to numerous polls, Reagan swept Southern college students, while losing college students in the Northeast. Meanwhile, The Washington Post called the elderly “a bedrock of Carter’s southern base.”

As LBJ explained to fellow Democrats after doing a 180-flip on civil rights as president and pushing the 1964 Civil Rights Act (which resembled the 1957 Civil Rights Act he had gutted as a senator): “I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years.” That’s according to a steward on Air Force One, who overhead him say it.

It’s one thing to rewrite history to say the Holocaust was when the Swedes killed the Jews. But it’s another to say that the Holocaust was when Jews killed the Germans.

That’s how liberals rewrite the history of civil rights in America.


3 posted on 08/30/2013 9:26:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it
Indeed, Minority Leader Republican Everett Dirksen led the fight to end the filibuster. Meanwhile, Democrats such as Richard Russell of Georgia and Strom Thurmond of South Carolina tried as hard as they could to sustain a filibuster.

This is the origin of the word "neo-conservative".
According to the liberals, those bad democrats that voted to stop civil rights were actually future Republicans.

There may be some truth in that. As the democrat party evolved into Marxism, many of the old democrats did move to the republican party.

Should we be calling their new members "neo-Marxists"?

4 posted on 08/30/2013 9:30:29 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

L.A. Times is for sale any wonder.


5 posted on 08/30/2013 9:31:10 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

That’s been common knowledge ‘round these parts for decades.


6 posted on 08/30/2013 9:35:56 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

You can remove the democrat from the PARTY but it’s damn hard to remove the democrat from the DEMOCRAT..

Many republicans are/still democrats.. they are called RINOs..


8 posted on 08/30/2013 9:48:30 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

a paper that used to cost a dime is now not even worth a dime.

NYT LAT .. something about them folks,, lie like there’s no tomorrow and reinvent the past..

sad.


10 posted on 08/30/2013 10:01:34 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Liberals have the right to lie...very much like Islamism, it is perfectly righteous to lie if it will advance the agenda, if anyone attempts to defy the lies, destroy them.


11 posted on 08/30/2013 10:03:13 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

Good news comrades, Dear Leader has increased the chocolate ration from 25 to 18 grams.

Truth is lies
Freedom is slavery
The GOPe is stalwart and brave. John Boner’s strength is the strength of ten because his heart is pure.


14 posted on 08/30/2013 10:06:27 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

bump


21 posted on 08/30/2013 5:32:36 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson