Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

RE: The CDC also did a similar study, at the President’s behest.

The CDC? CDC?

Why them? Are guns considered a disease to be controlled now?


29 posted on 08/28/2013 3:41:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
I know the CDC very well, I serve them directly. There is a Violence Prevention group and even an Injury Prevention group. Toxic chemical spills are tracked. Newborn infants are screened worldwide at birth. The CDC does a lot more than just disease.

The point of my post is they were intellectually honest in the firearms study. They were probably under a lot of pressure to emit a study that wasn't intellectually honest, but the people I know and work around -- no matter their political affiliations -- believe in hard science and in facts, politics be damned. I don't know the people who did this study, but I was delighted to see they were of the same moral character as the ones I do know.

That's the point I was trying to make. The President had an agenda, and the CDC simply reported facts instead of following an agenda. Because of that, I remain proud to be associated with them.

37 posted on 08/28/2013 5:28:42 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson