I am not sure what is wrong with this.
If ANY ‘religion’ was using their gathering places to house terrorist activities then that should not make them automatically safe from surveilance.
That would be cutting off your nose to spite your face.
And it is irrelevant that most muslims are not terrorists, what’s more important is that most terrorists are muslims.
Depends on your definition of terrorist. Our government has a pretty wonky view of who is and is not a terrorist.
I dont think theres a thing wrong with it.
it will likely in any case be used by certain shady creeps as precedent to allow for use against Churches. Thats just the kind of world we live in.
what’s more important is that most terrorists are muslims.
in order of Importance..that IS and should remain Number One