Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

“Is,” “as,” that’s just parsing of 19th century grammatical expression. The bottom line is “NATURAL BORN CITIZENS.”

What I think we can all agree on is that what it doesn’t say is: “the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall NOT be considered as natural born Citizens.”


106 posted on 08/26/2013 2:19:02 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
I think I've made clear my position on this particular point. Children born in foreign lands to American parent(S) in the service of our nation are Natural citizens.

Children born of parents with differing nationalities? Not so much. Such didn't exist in 1787.

109 posted on 08/26/2013 2:26:00 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson