Forgive me, but I thought Levin’s book was about NOT calling a Constitutional Convention. He’s argued for years that doing so invites all the leftists in to shred the Constitution. Levin isn’t calling for a convention. He’s calling for state legislatures to adopt amendments to the Constitution and then having the rest of the states - 3/4 of them - to ratify amendments concocted in state legislatures. Isn’t that right?
Coburn seems to be calling for the worse option - and outright convention. Which would be a disaster.
Levin is calling for an Amendments Convention as specified in Article V.