You must have a reading comprehension problem. I’m more than willing to appear, testify and show evidence of Obama’s 1983 naturalization as a U.S. citizen as a rebuttal witness. The Court ignores a rebuttal witness until the custodian of records has an opportunity to testify on the records in question.
We see this problem with many eligibility cases. The plaintiff demands records production to prove Obama is not eligible. The custodian of the records refuses to comply with a subpoena because compliance violates Obama’s right to privacy. The plaintiff goes online and complains of conspiracy, while Obots say proof of Obama’s ineligibility does not exist.
Proof of Obama’s ineligibility exists at U.S.C.I.S. It is where all Certificate of Naturalizations for naturalized citizens are stored. Like his birth certificate, Obama can fill out a short form and obtain a certified copy of his Certificate of Naturalization. Also, he can waive his right to privacy and post his Certificate of Naturalization online, like his birth certificate.
“I’m more than willing to appear, testify and show evidence of Obama’s 1983 naturalization as a U.S. citizen as a rebuttal witness.”
__
LOL, so you’ve said, but I’m not aware of any forum in which you are likely to be called as a rebuttal witness. Nevertheless, I will take you at your word that you would indeed be willing to appear if such an eventuality ever occurred.
But the fact is, you are the only person I’m aware of who’s even suggested that such evidence exists, and you’ve given us absolutely no reason to believe it exists other than your own earnest assurance that it does.
Perhaps the reading comprehension problem is yours if you can’t comprehend the current value of your purported evidence.
” Like his birth certificate, Obama can fill out a short form and obtain a certified copy of his Certificate of Naturalization. Also, he can waive his right to privacy and post his Certificate of Naturalization online, like his birth certificate”
And do you think Obama will ever do that?