But I would be upset if they took my spouse off the healthcare, but not the stay-at-home spouse of someone else. Seems like they could continue to cover the spouses but charge the full premium (no subsidy from UPS), and then it would be more of a “choice” to the employees, rather than seemingly a penalty.
And the reality probably would be that all spouses would choose insurance through the exchange, or whatever, rather than pay the full load for the super-premium packages that most employers have offered.