Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
"Suckered in"? You don't pitch something as heinous and repugnant as amnesty for illegals, unless you've willingly jumped in with both feet.

Yes. Suckered in. Read the context I replied to. I make no comment as to his support of the amnesty issue, but that he received the needed assurance that, while he knew it would bring controversy, it wouldn't harm his career in the long haul. This support came from the likes of McCan't and Grahamnesty.

51 posted on 08/23/2013 1:38:55 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Zack Attack
I make no comment as to his support of the amnesty issue, but that he received the needed assurance that, while he knew it would bring controversy, it wouldn't harm his career in the long haul.

Who the hell cares whether or not that turncoat received 'assurances' before plunging the knife into our backs? That's not even a weak justifier for what he did to us, and in fact, it's even worse than him merely being suckered in to supporting amnesty for illegals.

Rubio will never again be trusted by most conservatives. From here on out, his best course of action is to make amends with those who trusted him by being the best conservative he can possibly be. At least then he can retire from politics after his one term in office with some semblance of dignity.

52 posted on 08/23/2013 6:16:30 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson