Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Evidence?


47 posted on 08/19/2013 7:12:11 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigJ

US Law.

Naturalization is a separate process.

See the US State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual quoted below:

7 FAM 1131.6-3 Not Citizens by “Naturalization”
(CT:CON-349; 12-13-2010)
Section 201(g) NA and section 301(g) INA (8 U.S.C. 1401(g)) (formerly section 301(a)(7) INA) both specify that naturalization is “the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth.” Clearly, then, Americans who acquired their citizenship by birth abroad to U.S. citizens are not considered naturalized citizens under either act.


56 posted on 08/19/2013 7:20:38 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: TheBigJ

“Evidence?”

He came out of the womb of a US Citizen. That makes him a citizen at birth, not a naturalized citizen.

Such is the law, whether you agree with it or not.


332 posted on 08/20/2013 9:42:33 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson