“And in accordance with the Constitution, the very first Congress pass the very first rules of naturalization in the naturalization act of 1790 which state that a natural born citizen is a citizen of US Parents regardless of where the child was born”
And it was repealed 5 years later making your argument ‘Null & Void’.
Now, you tell me, who knew more what "natural born citizen" meant when used in the Constitution, those who wrote that 1790 bill and the one who signed it, or you?
Remember, George Washington presided over the Constitutional Convention and many members of the Congress in 1790 had been part of bringing about the US Constitution. Remember that the Constitution was ratified in 1787, and the law of 1790 was only 3 years later.
They used "natural born citizen" in the 1790 law to describe the child born to US citizens who were overseas at the time of the child's birth. Who is right about the use of that term, them or you?
It was replaced 5 years later by congress who further clarified the rules of naturalization as is their enumerated power.