Posted on 08/18/2013 10:53:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Probably nothing here.....BUT, if it is true -
How ironic that the “I wills stand by the Muslims first” Prez could be brought down by his Muzzy friends who perceive him as their enemy instead of their friend - in spite of all his appeals to them that he is one of them......
Appeals few here have even noticed.......
...Al-Shater said a U.S. delegation was sent to Cairo by Obama to press for the release of the imprisoned Muslim Brotherhood leaders...to prevent the release of explosive information.
Why would it NOT surprise me, if true, that these two clowns worked to "prevent the release" of this *explosive* info?
It seems to me that some muslims are very fine people. With them the extremes are probably more polarized than those who revere Solomon He teaches us ‘moderation in all things’. The muslims' false prophet preached peace when he was young and changed his mind. When he got older, he preached white-hot violence. So a muslim can pretty much be what he chooses to, or what the local mullah hammers.
“Muslim Brotherhood Claim: We’ve Got ‘Goods on Obama’ — Have Evidence to Put Him ‘In Prison’”
So do we but none of our leaders have the balls to use it.
Billary got cash from the Communist chinese army! He got reelected.
Obozo could get cash from the skinheads, North Koreans, Al-Qaeda and Iran and his electorate would just hold out there hand for a cut.
I think in Arabic his name means- "Full of ____"
Blackmail for aid
Is this the evidence, they are talking about?
That Assad was responsible for the slaughter at Benghazi.
Below is a very interesting and different look at who might have been responsible for the killing of Ambassador Stevens and others at Benghazi, Assad.
Former Muslim Brotherhood Member tells us what the Government won’t about the Terror Attack in Benghazi August 12, 2013
Dr. Mark Christian from the Global Faith Institute sent The Gateway Pundit his account of the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012:
Syrian president Bashar el Assad, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah of Lebanon are fully responsible for the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President
Obama has known this fact since the minute he first learned about the attack.
Stevens, from his Benghazi base, was stockpiling weapons - and resourcing the expert fighters who could use them - to topple Assad’s rule in Syria. On September 11, 2012, Assad powerfully punched back, raiding the Benghazi compound which housed the armament for his own destruction. Though Assad’s reprisal resulted in the loss of four American lives, including Stevens, he forcefully conveyed that he would not be thrown out of the ring.
The Syrian uprising is not a simple “the good guys vs. the bad guys” action-packed conflict. While there is plenty of action, there are no good guys. There are, however, two opponents who have been duking it out for hundreds of years, the Sunnis and the Shiites.
In the Sunni corner, we have U.S. President Barack Obama, championed primarily by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Their combatants, the Shiites, include Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah - the Lebanese militia controlled by Iran and Syria.
Under President Barack Obama’s direction in the 2011 Arab Spring, the Sunnis had already ousted evil dictators from countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. It appeared to be pro-democracy freedom-fighting at its finest. It wasn’t. The overthrown governments were quickly replaced with Muslim-Brotherhood-aligned, Sunni Islamic theocracies. And the next country on the list for overthrow was Syria. But unlike the easier targets of Mubarek, Ben Ali, and Gaddafi, Shiite Syrian leader Bashar Assad has the powerful allies of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia.
The Assad regime was fully aware of the shrouded activity in Benghazi, fully aware that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the man credited for the assassination of Gaddafi, was much more than an ambassador. Though serving in Tripoli as the U.S. Ambassador to transition a tribal Libya to Sunni Islamic rule, Stevens covertly used Benghazi as his base of operation for the next phase of Arab Spring: overthrowing Assad in Syria. From his Benghazi compound Stevens stored and supplied weapons for thousands of hired, rebel fighters - many of which were al-Qaeda - headed to Syria.
Is this the evidence, they are talking about?
That Assad was responsible for the slaughter at Benghazi.
Below is a very interesting and different look at who might have been responsible for the killing of Ambassador Stevens and others at Benghazi, Assad.
Former Muslim Brotherhood Member tells us what the Government won’t about the Terror Attack in Benghazi August 12, 2013
Dr. Mark Christian from the Global Faith Institute sent The Gateway Pundit his account of the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012:
Syrian president Bashar el Assad, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah of Lebanon are fully responsible for the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President
Obama has known this fact since the minute he first learned about the attack.
Stevens, from his Benghazi base, was stockpiling weapons - and resourcing the expert fighters who could use them - to topple Assad’s rule in Syria. On September 11, 2012, Assad powerfully punched back, raiding the Benghazi compound which housed the armament for his own destruction. Though Assad’s reprisal resulted in the loss of four American lives, including Stevens, he forcefully conveyed that he would not be thrown out of the ring.
The Syrian uprising is not a simple “the good guys vs. the bad guys” action-packed conflict. While there is plenty of action, there are no good guys. There are, however, two opponents who have been duking it out for hundreds of years, the Sunnis and the Shiites.
In the Sunni corner, we have U.S. President Barack Obama, championed primarily by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Their combatants, the Shiites, include Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah - the Lebanese militia controlled by Iran and Syria.
Under President Barack Obama’s direction in the 2011 Arab Spring, the Sunnis had already ousted evil dictators from countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. It appeared to be pro-democracy freedom-fighting at its finest. It wasn’t. The overthrown governments were quickly replaced with Muslim-Brotherhood-aligned, Sunni Islamic theocracies. And the next country on the list for overthrow was Syria. But unlike the easier targets of Mubarek, Ben Ali, and Gaddafi, Shiite Syrian leader Bashar Assad has the powerful allies of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia.
The Assad regime was fully aware of the shrouded activity in Benghazi, fully aware that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the man credited for the assassination of Gaddafi, was much more than an ambassador. Though serving in Tripoli as the U.S. Ambassador to transition a tribal Libya to Sunni Islamic rule, Stevens covertly used Benghazi as his base of operation for the next phase of Arab Spring: overthrowing Assad in Syria. From his Benghazi compound Stevens stored and supplied weapons for thousands of hired, rebel fighters - many of which were al-Qaeda - headed to Syria.
Is this the evidence, they are talking about?
That Assad was responsible for the slaughter at Benghazi.
Below is a very interesting and different look at who might have been responsible for the killing of Ambassador Stevens and others at Benghazi, Assad.
Former Muslim Brotherhood Member tells us what the Government won’t about the Terror Attack in Benghazi August 12, 2013
Dr. Mark Christian from the Global Faith Institute sent The Gateway Pundit his account of the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012:
Syrian president Bashar el Assad, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah of Lebanon are fully responsible for the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President
Obama has known this fact since the minute he first learned about the attack.
Stevens, from his Benghazi base, was stockpiling weapons - and resourcing the expert fighters who could use them - to topple Assad’s rule in Syria. On September 11, 2012, Assad powerfully punched back, raiding the Benghazi compound which housed the armament for his own destruction. Though Assad’s reprisal resulted in the loss of four American lives, including Stevens, he forcefully conveyed that he would not be thrown out of the ring.
The Syrian uprising is not a simple “the good guys vs. the bad guys” action-packed conflict. While there is plenty of action, there are no good guys. There are, however, two opponents who have been duking it out for hundreds of years, the Sunnis and the Shiites.
In the Sunni corner, we have U.S. President Barack Obama, championed primarily by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Their combatants, the Shiites, include Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah - the Lebanese militia controlled by Iran and Syria.
Under President Barack Obama’s direction in the 2011 Arab Spring, the Sunnis had already ousted evil dictators from countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. It appeared to be pro-democracy freedom-fighting at its finest. It wasn’t. The overthrown governments were quickly replaced with Muslim-Brotherhood-aligned, Sunni Islamic theocracies. And the next country on the list for overthrow was Syria. But unlike the easier targets of Mubarek, Ben Ali, and Gaddafi, Shiite Syrian leader Bashar Assad has the powerful allies of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia.
The Assad regime was fully aware of the shrouded activity in Benghazi, fully aware that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the man credited for the assassination of Gaddafi, was much more than an ambassador. Though serving in Tripoli as the U.S. Ambassador to transition a tribal Libya to Sunni Islamic rule, Stevens covertly used Benghazi as his base of operation for the next phase of Arab Spring: overthrowing Assad in Syria. From his Benghazi compound Stevens stored and supplied weapons for thousands of hired, rebel fighters - many of which were al-Qaeda - headed to Syria.
Never said I thought they would see the inside of a prison.
Maybe the blackmail was how they got that "best friend" in the first place? I recall reading on FR that among the very first visitors to the Obama White House was . . . the Muslim Brotherhood.
He probably has told his story. We haven’t heard it and we won’t.
I am ready to string him up in front of WH
In the old west they would have just strung him up in front of the WH
I would be happy with that outcome, make an example of him for his views on abortion and gay marriage and anti Christian values
But I am reminded that Vengeance is mine, says the Lord
Now on the other hand...if a nursery school was being held hostage by a crazed gunman that promised to kill all the children, they would send in a sniper to take the guy out
Is there really a difference
In the old west they would have just strung him up in front of the WH
I would be happy with that outcome, make an example of him for his views on abortion and gay marriage and anti Christian values
But I am reminded that Vengeance is mine, says the Lord
Now on the other hand...if a nursery school was being held hostage by a crazed gunman that promised to kill all the children, they would send in a sniper to take the guy out
Is there really a difference
Sorry for triple post, was due to poor signal this morning
Sorry for triple post, was due to poor signal this morning
The Muslim Brotherhood is about to turn on Barak Hussein Obama. I reckon he can’t follow their orders anymore, there are too many leakers in progress.
Oh how it is to laugh, Obama has barrels of Obama monkies doing damage control.Reminds me of a one arm paper hanger from the 3rd Reich.
These Islamofascist extemists basically eat their own, and I hope they give it all they have got.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.