[don-o]

Hillary Clinton exploded at a congressman two days after Benghazi

[tomkat]

Flack = Over Target

[ronnie raygun]

Starting early, the longer you tell a lie the more it becomes the truth. By the time she begins her campaign the numb nuts who are flying under the “ we are making history again with the first women president” banner will have already been conditioned to blame the GOP for maligning this wonderful woman

[DoughtyOne]

Well, if anyone would recognize brazon deceipt, it would have to be Hillary.

Unfortunately, she's back in "brazon deceipt" mode again, so I'll just take this for what it's worth... essentially nothing.


Ramirez's latest political cartoon LARGE VERSION 08/16/2013: LINK  LINK to regular sized version of Ramirez's latest, and an archive of his political cartoons.

FOLKS, THOSE OF YOU WHO CAN, PLEASE CLICK HERE AND PENCIL IN YOUR DONATION TO HELP END THIS FREEPATHON.  THANK YOU!
...this is a general all purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

[Da Coyote]

STFU, Hillabeast.

You have no talent and have never told the truth in your sorry life.

You would be a sleazy lawyer in a two bit firm had you not boinked the sleazemeister.

[gaijin]

SEVEN days, not two.

LOUD CHIDING, not yelling.

Wow, now THAT is a very compelling denial, right there.

Powerful stuff, my, my, my...!

[jersey117]

Really? Someone ought to update her that al Qaeda just released a statement taking responsibility for the attack and is now calling for new attacks. You Tube film at 11.....

[Fresh Wind]

A Clinton “deliberately lied”?

Actually, it would be more surprising to observe that a Clinton deliberately told the truth.

[Norm Lenhart]

“Nick Merrill, a Clinton aide, provided the following statement to The Hill on the condition that it be run in its entirety. “

Good Now we can do it too and point to Clinton as opening those gates.

[InterceptPoint]

As far as I know, Kinzinger is a straight arrow from the Class of 2010. So I believe him as I’m sure most if not all of us do.

But given that, wouldn’t you expect that at least one Senator or Congressman would stand in his defense?

If not, there are only two viable explanations:

1. Kinzinger is lying.
2. The GOP is, in fact, as spineless as think it is.

I’m betting on Option 2.

[Theodore R.]

I think the American people will believe Hillary on everything regardless of truth. The American people have a great desire to hold onto the Clintons. It must remind them of their own foibles.

[Libloather]

10 months and 27 days later, and suddenly remembered he heard something

That was so long ago. Could it be that Hillary's memory is a bit off after the immaculate concussion?

[Servant of the Cross]

“Brazen Deceit” is Shrillery’s middle name.

[csmusaret]

Hillary’s State Department and the CIA developed talking points that Susan Rice says she relied on when she went on five Sunday news shows and blamed a video for causing riots in Benghazi. For weeks Obama and Hillary also blamed the video; even at the United Nations and on national TV. Although the talking points were edited several times to please the State Department, no version ever used the word video. The infamous video was not mentioned a single time in any version of the Administration’s official talking points.

[Robert357]

Speaking of brazen deceit, it is obviously a “vast right wing conspiracy,” but what does it matter now?

If she runs for President there will be so many wonderful attack ad sound-bites.

[Ray76]

A Clinton complaining about “brazen deceit”??? Hahahahahahaha! That’s rich.

[Grampa Dave]

Clintoon and the head liar in the outhouse, have problems controlling even their liberal media re Benghazi.

There is no way they can control other outlets.

Below is a very interesting and different look at who might have been responsible for the killing of Ambassador Stephens and others at Benghazi, Assad.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/print/former-muslim-brotherhood-member-tells-us-what-the-government-wont-about-the-terror-attack-in-Benghazi

Former Muslim Brotherhood Member tells us what the Government won’t about the Terror Attack in Benghazi
August 12, 2013

Dr. Mark Christian from the Global Faith Institute sent The Gateway Pundit his account of the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012:

Syrian president Bashar el Assad, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah of Lebanon are fully responsible for the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President Obama has known this fact since the minute he first learned about the attack.

Stevens, from his Benghazi base, was stockpiling weapons - and resourcing the expert fighters who could use them - to topple Assad’s rule in Syria. On September 11, 2012, Assad powerfully punched back, raiding the Benghazi compound which housed the armament for his own destruction. Though Assad’s reprisal resulted in the loss of four American lives, including Stevens, he forcefully conveyed that he would not be thrown out of the ring.

The Syrian uprising is not a simple “the good guys vs. the bad guys” action-packed conflict. While there is plenty of action, there are no good guys. There are, however, two opponents who have been duking it out for hundreds of years, the Sunnis and the Shiites. In the Sunni corner, we have U.S. President Barack Obama, championed primarily by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Their combatants, the Shiites, include Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah - the Lebanese militia controlled by Iran and Syria.

Under President Barack Obama’s direction in the 2011 Arab Spring, the Sunnis had already ousted evil dictators from countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. It appeared to be pro-democracy freedom-fighting at its finest. It wasn’t. The overthrown governments were quickly replaced with Muslim-Brotherhood-aligned, Sunni Islamic theocracies. And the next country on the list for overthrow was Syria. But unlike the easier targets of Mubarek, Ben Ali, and Gaddafi, Shiite Syrian leader Bashar Assad has the powerful allies of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia.

The Assad regime was fully aware of the shrouded activity in Benghazi, fully aware that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the man credited for the assassination of Gaddafi, was much more than an ambassador. Though serving in Tripoli as the U.S. Ambassador to transition a tribal Libya to Sunni Islamic rule, Stevens covertly used Benghazi as his base of operation for the next phase of Arab Spring: overthrowing Assad in Syria. From his Benghazi compound Stevens stored and supplied weapons for thousands of hired, rebel fighters - many of which were al-Qaeda - headed to Syria.

[Colonel_Flagg]

Of course, the best way to avoid ‘brazen deceit’ is for Hitlery to come clean about what really happened at Benghazi.

Won’t hold my breath.

[CAluvdubya]

So what? Nothing will be done about it. Issa is all bluster.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Cute little Clintonesque verbal sleight of hand. The spokesman doesn’t come out and deny that a private meeting took place, he just refers to a couple of public meetings. In inferring there were only the larger meetings, he maintains plausible deniability about the knowledge of the private meeting and redirects the focus of the “conversation”.